We learned earlier this month that three witnesses had come forth alleging that Doug Emhoff, the father of Vice President Kamala Harris, sexually assaulted his ex-girlfriend in 2012. Emhoff, 59, is alleged to have struck the woman in the face so forcefully that she stooped in a range of valets late at night. The three witnesses, who are all close friends with the victim, are all referred to as” Jane” in the report from The Daily Mail.
Advertisement
Doug Emhoff was given a chance to deny the story on MSNBC, but he did n’t.
According to the Daily Mail’s review, in May 2012, Jane attended the renowned amfAR Gala near Cannes, France, with Emhoff after receiving cards from educated friends. But, a Jane ally recalls that she received a troubling call that evening. Jane cried in a taxi as she revealed that her day had struck her. The friend, unaware of how to aid, was unable to achieve Jane again after that visit.
According to Jane’s companions, Emhoff had told her that their maid had accused him of causing her pregnancy, though he denied any wrongdoing. Despite rejecting these claims, Emhoff allegedly admitted to paying the nanny an$ 80, 000 settlement after she signed a non-disclosure agreement.
The friends claimed that Emhoff and Jane never saw each other again and that he and Jane left the excursion first to return to Los Angeles for Ella’s 13th day on May 29.
Related: New Poll Suggests Kamala Totally Committed Political Suicide
Advertisement
Emhoff and Kamala keep their calm when they appeared on MSNBC on Friday night with Joe Scarborough, who gave him a chance to target the “tabloid reports” about his private life.
” I’m just curious”, Scarborough said. ” I know I seem like a pretty zen, conscious man, but I think I’d become pissed off. And I’m just wondering, how do you all keep centered? How do you maintain discipline and avoid definitely retaliation and pushing yourself so hard at these things?
Emhoff responded assertively, stating,” We do n’t have time to be pissed off. We do n’t have time to focus on it. It’s all a diversion. It’s meant to “get us off our match,” he says.
” Does it get you off your activity”? Scarborough asked.
Emhoff strongly stated that they remain committed to winning the vote, emphasizing,” All we are doing, all we talk about is this election. We understand the bets. We understand the duty”.
You’ll notice that Emhoff does n’t make any point of disproven the stories that surround him in this exchange. Few either. It is not a rejection to call it a diversion. It is not a rejection to pretend to be upset about the allegations.  ,
Advertisement
Emhoff does not, of course, have any genuine reason to be angry; instead, the mainstream media has generally shied away from the allegations as if they never occurred. These reports clearly lack attention or curiosity, which is obvious. Heck, even Scarborough did n’t mention them with any specificity, and he basically spoonfed Emhoff with a template for how to respond to the question. The press fabricates it to hide the allegations against him, but the allegations are supported by the media.