In Australia, celebrated liberal democracy, one now never walk one’s arms in a non-state-sanctioned manner, the late imposed penalty for which is a term of imprisonment up to twelve weeks and$ 16, 177 in fines.
Advertisement
Connected:  , Australia Codifies’ Misinformation ‘ Ban in Anti-Free Speech Laws
Via ABC News (emphasis added ):
When a judge sets his expression next month, A , a self-described Nazi, will become the first man in Australia to receive a jail sentence for performing an forbidden Nazi salute.
Magistrate Brett Sonnet told Jacob Hersant on Wednesday he will be sentenced to a “relatively modest term of imprisonment”  , at his next court appearance. ” It will not be a serious term of imprisonment, but I have not determined the length”, Sonnet said.
Hersant’s initial scheduled release date for hersant was October 23; Sonnet originally intended for him to remain in custody on Wednesday…
On October 27, 2023, Hersant saluted and praised Nazi head Adolf Hitler in front of television cameras outside Victoria County Court. Following his judgment for causing aggressive condition, Hersant had just escaped prison.
Six weeks after the state government of Victoria declared the Nazi welcome unlawful, he made the sign. In December, the Federal Parliament passed legislation that made it illegal to display or trade Nazi hate characters in public or in people.
*Just a “modest term of imprisonment” for violent statement. Is she not generous? Is she not only?
Associated:  , YouTube Adopts WHO ‘ Medical Misinformation ‘ Repression Regime ,
In a free society, people are free to express whatever they want, regardless of whether any particular ideology or speech is common, unpleasant, or whatever else is irrelevant.
Advertisement
( For the document, as an aside, in my personal view, embracing any philosophy as antiquated, as certain to a place and time that no longer exists, as Nazism or socialism any 19th or 20th philosophy is foolish and unserious. Nobody was possibly believe that Australia will re-emerge with the Third Reich.
The federal makes a gesture but forbidden that people who perform it in public would never even see it, which is a great irony.
This trend is called the Streisand Effect, and it is very true. No one would treatment and the Nazis would remain always in obscurity if the state and society allowed them to spend their entire lives, including the few of them in Australia, in Sieg Heil.
Otherwise, the state decided to make a saint for free speech out of them.
Via Britannica (emphasis added ):
Streisand result: a psychological condition that prevents attention from being drawn to something simply serves to bring attention to it. The title derives from Barbra Streisand’s complaint against a shooter in 2003, which attracted attention to the image she was suing having removed from the Internet.
According to scholars, censorship frequently backfires when the public hears a strong person or organization attempt to control free speech. It can inspire people anger, especially if the tale involves an underdog. Also, attempted censorship may spur curiosity. The banning of publications and websites, for example, often drives more interest in them. People have a tendency to want to weigh what is disagreeable about something that has been subjected to criticism.
Advertisement
Editor’s note: As we’ve skillfully documented around,  , Google repression of PJ Media is out of control.  ,
 , We wo n’t be doing any Nazi salutes here, but nevertheless this article is likely to be flagged as “misinformation” — or hatespeech, or whatever alleged violation of constantly-changing policy — and demonetized by Google.  ,
Consider lending money to our heavily censored operation if you like the independent media we provide that is free of commercial slant and condition censorship.  ,
Use discount code , FIGHT for 60 % off your new Club Platinum account