By now it’s commonplace to note that Kamala Harris often seems out of her depth, like she’s unsure what to say about policy, or how to explain her past positions, or why she has n’t already done the things she’s promised to do if she’s elected given that she’s the current vice president.
But throughout her battle, she has been persistent and assertive on a particular area. She’s convinced that Donald Trump may kill America if he’s reelected. And certainly “destroy” in the sense of implement bad guidelines, but that he’ll around people away with the defense and put them in camps.
She is currently frequently discussing this. She became empathetic at one point after former president Donald Trump’s picture blatantly criticizing the use of the state and the countless studies and laws he’s been subjected to during her Wednesday night meeting with Bret Baier on Fox News.
The vice chairman, her voice , rising in anger, jabbed her hand at Baier and said,” You and I both know that he has talked about turning the British government on the British people. He has suggested pursuing those who engage in relaxing opposition. He has discussed locking citizens out because they disagree with him.
She stated this year at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania that any opponent of President Donald Trump would be a pawn in the country. He claims that he would employ the defense to pursue them.
Earlier this month, during , an sound town hall with Charlamagne Tha God, Harris claimed without a hint of sarcasm that if Trump is elected he’ll use the Department of Justice” as a tool against his political opponents”, adding,” You know who does that? Rulers do that”. At one point during the show, she , agreed with a caller , who said Trump will lock “anyone who does n’t look white into camps”, replying,” You’ve hit on a really important point and expressed it I think so well”.
That’s only a picking from this year, but there are many other recent examples. In Harris ‘ increasingly extreme rhetoric about Trump and the risks he poses to the state in the final days of the presidential vote. The Biden campaign’s stance that Trump is an philosophical threat to American politics was unspoken yet before Harris secured the Democratic nominee’s election from President Joe Biden. Harris has adopted that idea and carried it.
The goal of it is n’t just to spooky voters into casting their ballot against the former president, but also to avert some unstable would-be assassin from attacking Trump ( although some Democrats undoubtedly see that as a happy outcome of this Trump-as-dictator rhetoric ).
Its principal goal is to encourage Democratic electors to form violent opposition if Trump wins in November.
Take into account the disparate rhetoric between the Harris and Trump efforts. Trump often makes sweeping ( and mostly true ) statements about the deep state, about the border and illegal immigration, about crime, about how Harris and the Democrats are destroying the country. But when he uses the phrase “destroying the state”, he’s talking about things like crime, homelessness, drug habit, rampant inflation and the cost of groceries. These issues, he says, are the result of laws Democrats have put in place. If you’re looking for someone to blame, he says, responsible Biden and Harris, because all these issues are their problem.
But Harris and the Democrats ‘ language does not reflect this. They are not arguing that Trump’s laws may cause crime and inflation to worsen. Democrats are n’t really interested in policy.
They are promoting the idea that if Trump is elected, he will become a totalitarian dictator, and will use the presidency’s authority to pursue common Americans. That’s an extraordinary place with no basis in reality, and it’s honestly unhinged. When you’re trying to stoke a strong reaction, you do n’t say things like that, and the reaction Democrats are hoping to provoke is violent resistance to a second Trump term.
After all, if you truly believed that Trump would order the military and the Justice Department to arrest you and your family, would n’t you intervene? Would n’t you march in the streets to stop the emergence of a fascist dictatorship and protect your nation? At least two would-be killers have taken the Democrats ‘ anti-Trump speech significantly. Harris is anticipating that more people will vote no on a second Trump word before Election Day, if they must. He is hoping they will do so in the streets.
Liberals themselves established a law for this four years ago. Harris herself was out in front of the protesters during the BLM protests in the summer of 2020, notably working to raise loan money for those who had been arrested. Of the demonstrations themselves, she , said this , in a June 2020 meeting with Stephen Colbert:” All careful. They’re never gonna stop before Election Day in November, and they’re never gonna quit after Election Day … They’re never gonna let up, and they should no”.
The political unrest that BLM and Antifa rioters elicited from Harris and her friend Democrats was well aware of how damaging to Trump’s reelection campaign it would be, and they did their utmost to amplify it and defend it by asserting that they were the party’s social superior. The demonstrators and rioters were simply reacting to widespread unfairness, after all, and as Martin Luther King Jr. when said,” A mob is the vocabulary of the unknown”.
All of this only becomes feeling once you realize that Harris, a left-wing extreme, is not just a bumbling legislator who uses violence as a political tool. Who cares if a few neighborhoods here in America are torn to the earth in race riots if your goal is to capture and possess political power as part of a revolutionary system to convert America? Who cares if some young girls are sexually assaulted and killed by illegal immigrants, or if a few apartment buildings are taken over by illegal alien groups? Those points on their own may be uncomfortable or shocking, but they’re all in the services of a greater objective, which is the re-shaping of American culture. So it’s all determined.
In the event of a Trump success, Harris and the Democrats are setting the stage for large political turmoil by using this characterization of Trump as rounding up Americans and putting them in tents. The turmoil may serve to ruin Trump’s management before he even assumes office, and to cause so many Americans to beg their regrets the day they always cast their ballots for him.
It’s the parameter ‘ veto on drugs, and it’s simply what Harris intends to and hopes to incite if Trump wins.