The national administration’s efforts to control and abuse Elon Musk are described in The New York Times. His talent is instantly a primary cause of America’s glory– and by expansion the U. S. bureaucracy’s– and locus of rebellion against the venality, dysfunction and stupidity of the status quo.  ,
Advertisement
Mr. Musk’s rocket company, SpaceX, properly dictates NASA’s jet release plan. He assists him in orbiting the majority of the Defense Department’s spacecraft. His businesses received$ 3 billion over almost 100 different contracts with 17 governmental agencies last year.
According to brutal quote from Mario Nawfal,” SpaceX will do 80 % of all size to circle this year. China will do 12 %. The rest of the world may contribute 8 %. That includes Boeing, Lockheed, and everyone else”. The New York Times continues to add that, in contrast, “he has thrown his wealth and power behind former president Donald J. Trump and has vowed to make Mr. Musk mind of a new “government performance fee” with the authority to suggest extensive cuts to federal authorities and modifications to federal rules.”
Given that Musk is probably the next most dangerous person dead, given that Donald Trump represents the risk of Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini all in one. Elon not only poses a risk to the government, but he also stands in the way of a Kamala administration.
Musk is both friend and foe to the creation. Can’t live with him, ca n’t live without him.
The difficulty of controlling Elon is an illustration of the issue of stupidity controlling ability. How does Kamala Harris effectively manage a person whose Starlink satellite star had 4 million people worldwide, despite Senator Ted Budd‘s claim that she has no connected a single person to the internet “using the$ 42.45 billion allocated for the Ring program”? It would be equivalent to appointing Albert Einstein to the Detroit Public Schools.
Advertisement
Throughout history, there have always been issues with donkeys leading lions, but the difference has typically been of a single order of magnitude. This time it’s worse. The government’s issue with Musk prefigures the upcoming conflict over AI control. In the near future, AI may outsmart Elon more than Elon does the clerks. Can you really put bureaucracy in charge of superintelligence? Can the blinkered Wokes keep their minds from circling them in the minds of others?
The record is not encouraging. Banqueaucracies have historically demonstrated inability to withstand the control of common corporations led by individuals who are no longer educated. The laws enacted to contain them were able to be escaped by the bureaucracy itself. Superintelligent and super-capable entities can easily manipulate their less intelligent human counterparts to elude confinement, as David Rostcheck put it, without the latter realizing what is happening.
Containment appears to be a temporary measure. Superintelligent entities appear to eventually evade control, even if it is successful for an extended period of time. The game theory is unfavorable because the escapee only needs to succeed once while the defender must thwart escape attempts constantly.
The only way for the common person to maintain freedom of action is to foster more and not fewer Elon Musks by encouraging multiple superintelligences, in human terms. We should anticipate an intelligence arms race because the best counter to a superintelligent entity is a more powerful superintelligent entity. Intelligent entities form their own alliances, which may not necessarily align with their creators ‘ intentions”.
Advertisement
A race to the top, not a bottom-strike, is the only way to survive. That is why DEI and Wokery is so dangerous. There is no safety there.