If Vice President Kamala Harris is elected leader and the results in the House and Senate are positive, they will end the Senate filibuster in order to enact Roe v. Wade as the supreme court of the land, according to the campaign of Vice President Kamala Harris. They disregard polls that suggest other issues are at the top of Americans ‘ daily worries.
The John Lewis Voting Rights Act may be passed once more by the alleged Harris supervision, this time to repeal it. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W. V., and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz., blocked that work in 2021 but will not be in office in 2025.  , And next, depending on their desire, they may even make Puerto Rico a condition. Therefore the District of Columbia. Then they would undoubtedly call it quits and return to the 60-vote concept. Well, perhaps they would first look at moving single-payer medical and, of course, use 51 votes to pass a non-controversial wealth tax, stifle the Supreme Court under the pretense of judicial reform, repeal the Second Amendment, go large amnesty, or grant citizenship to more than 15 million people who they improperly welcomed into the country. But that’s perhaps it. After that, it was utter normal.
No major person who comprehends the Senate’s filibuster or the term “gridlock” would ever consider for a minute whether a Democrat president, House, and Senate do exercise enough restraint to keep their most extreme pet projects from succeeding in passing legislation they know may not garner 60 votes. Only lower the bar and get what you want if your thoughts are too extreme to receive 60 votes. Who would be the voice of reason against that — Sen. Bernie Sanders? Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer? Sen. Elizabeth Warren?
Despite how many days, Democrat individuals have stated that they are protecting politics, but they have not done anything of the sort. One more ballot per team than the other group is politics. The Senate’s long-developed rule-making method is the natural result of the filibuster, which is not contained in the Constitution but rather is a natural extension of the process. For a bill to be filibuster-proof, it required the aid of 67 lawmakers until a law change reduced that amount to 60 in 1975. Congressional methods are not designed so one group or the other, with 51 votes, is business dramatic swings in our government’s laws and policies. They are intended to power policy down the middle and away from both philosophical extremes, which is the opposite of what they are trying to achieve.
Our Constitution and Senate and House laws are written to urge legislators, who work for the people, to have eye-to-eye, talk, and sacrifice for the greater good. The 60 votes serve as an effective buffer against radicalism. Harris and her party have utter contempt for that statute book.
Abortion and Elections
Harris claims that her team will simply eliminate the filibuster to win on that issue after acknowledging that the country is divided on various abortion issues. She claims so in a flippant manner, as though this is not contentious and would not have a greater impact. In actuality, the majority of Americans support restrictions on abortion. While it is true that the typical U.S. Democrat voter supports unrestricted abortion right from the moment of birth, Harris ‘ position on these issues is both extreme and unpopular. She and her team come to the conclusion that they can cram their preferences down the country’s throat into a hotly contested issue without feeling any harm when Senate leadership turns the other way.
The John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which contains policies that would make it easier to rig elections, wo n’t ever receive 60 votes. It could garner 51 votes, which would eliminate the need for voter identification in all 50 states and allow for ballot harvesting. The Democrats would have the ability to legally stuff ballot boxes, go door to door to collect them, and have plenty of illegal votes counted. It would create, not eliminate, uncertainty and, worse, would turn over state authority to run elections to unelected federal bureaucrats.
Illegal Immigration
The proposed Harris administration’s majority of Democrat retreads suggest that the solution to the immigration crisis they created would be to simply grant amnesty, or a quick path to citizenship, to 20 million illegal immigrants, including the roughly 500, 000 who have criminal records in their home countries. Puerto Rico, half of which rejects the idea of becoming a state, would become our 51st state. D. C. would be 52nd. This would give the Democrats four more Senate seats, which would effectively negate Republican Senate representation if the filibuster were to be removed. Single payer healthcare, wealth taxes, and other pet projects would bring up the rear.
Playing for Keeps
Many commentators incorrectly believe that this circumstance is related to the Dems ‘ decision to end the filibuster in order to clear the way for President Barack Obama to confirm his appointed federal judges. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell promised him that his rule change would come back to haunt him when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did that. The Dems confirmed dozens of Obama’s appointed judges with 51 votes. In response to the hypocritical screams he was destroying democracy, McConnell used the same procedure to appoint three Supreme Court justices who the leftists detest. What Harris is proposing today is unquestionably worse.
With the understanding that there will likely be a turnabout in the future and that their worst Republican policy nightmares will come true, the Dems are not threatening to end the filibuster to break a few ties. This time, they are competing for money.
Because they will have a permanent filibuster-proof Senate majority, they can stop talking to the Republican side of the aisle if they can completely eliminate the filibuster, buy four more senators, rig our voting systems, and rejigger the Supreme Court to create a roster of 13 mostly leftist justices. Additionally, the Republicans will never have enough votes to reinstate legislative bumpers for both parties. Democrats have not assessed the likely conservative counter-offensive and determined that the risk is worthwhile. They perceive no risk. With all these profound changes, they have no real control over the people and can continue to do whatever they want until the end of time. A victory in November and a conscience they sorely lack are the only things that keep them from progressing. We will be a functional leftist autocracy.
Our nation has so far embraced the idea that we the people elect our elected officials to represent us like adults in a meaningful way in order to pass laws that benefit as many Americans as possible. The repeal of the filibuster, especially for the reasons cited by Harris, would strip almost a perfect half of the nation of any meaningful federal representation; even a Republican president and house would be replaced. No serious person would believe that the Harris Democrats would not run wild if they had a rigged durable majority and a 51-vote rule in place.
Regardless of who occupies the Oval Office, Conservatives will be able to survive for the next four years. Who wants to live in a place where only a single point of view is dictated by those who have demonstrated themselves to be ineffective enough to impose rules that have been in place for generations? Who will back a Republican Party that ignores the partisan rule-making that is occurring and does n’t act to stop it? Both parties ‘ positions in this presidential election are in a referendum on whether or not they can see the future while acknowledging its significance.  ,
Thomas Crist is a husband, father, lawyer, and political conservative who loves his country and despises all myopic hypocrisy regardless of its source.