If Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump’s Democrat opponent, wins the election, the Pravda push has repeatedly questioned past president Donald Trump over and over again whether he would accept the outcome. Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, has heard the problem ad nauseam because also.  ,
Caitlin Huey-Burns, a political correspondent for CBS News, punched the previous leader with the problem in late August as the Democratic National Committee considered appointing Harris as the party’s candidate following Joe Biden’s forced withdrawal from his reelection campaign.  ,
” Will you accept the results of this poll”? the writer asked.  ,
” Absolutely. I assume it’s going to be a fair vote. The answer is definitely I will if it’s going to be a fair and free poll,” Trump said.
Burns pressed with this crazy issue. ” What does fair mean to you”?
” It means the votes are counted. It means that vote are fair”, Trump said. ” It means they do n’t cheat on the election, they do n’t drop ballots, install new rules and regulations that they do n’t have the power to do”.
In other words, if leftist activists and electoral officials do n’t rig the previous election as they did the first one.  ,
” They do n’t use 51 intelligence agents to give phony reports, which had an affect on the election. They do n’t carry out many of the actions they did in the previous election, he added, referring to the former intelligence officials who wrote a letter insisting the Hunter Biden laptop story from the New York Post was” Russian disinformation”. It was not. It was very true. And the Deep State silenced a tale that many Americans claim could have altered the election’s outcome, thanks to a involved commercial media.  ,
Would Tell
However, the Pravda press has frequently been against eliciting questions from Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor. Tim Walz, the exact topic.  ,
The Federalist is asking. We sent internet inquiries to the vice president’s office and the Harris campaign asking if she would take the results of the election if she lost to Trump in the following month.  ,
As of publishing, insects.  ,
The Federalist even questioned the organization’s associates about accepting the election results if the former president were to win. Last month, its 700+ past leaders in the government, military, and national security signed an open letter expressing support for Harris, which made headlines and received a lot of subscribers. One of the sponsors is past CIA Director John Brennan. Additionally, he is one of the 51 petitioners who falsely claimed that the Hunter Biden laptop was a source of Russian propaganda.  ,
Again, no answer.  ,
Why are n’t the accomplice media asking whether Harris, the Democrats, the intelligence community, and other swamp creatures will be so patriotic that, if Trump wins, they should n’t be asking?
They Do Not Embrace
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo. ) has been a far too busy publishing all kinds of stories to ask all kinds of conservatives whether they will accept the election results if their candidate loses. ), Rep. Barry Moore (R-Ala. ), even Republican voters at large via various polls. They’re the equal” editors” who like to ignore the fact that leading Democrats resisted accepting the 2016 election results, in which Trump defeated Hillary Clinton, Obama’s former secretary of state, and the Pravda press’s political choice.  ,
” I do not see this president-elect as a legitimate president”, the late Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., told NBC News as Trump was taking office amid Democrats ‘ cries of” Russian interference” . ,
” I believe that the Russians and other people conspired to help him win the election,” he said. That’s certainly correct. That’s no good. That’s not the empty political method”, he added.  ,
Sour Grapes Hillary repeated this statement and it is still does.  ,
In a 2019 CBS News meeting, she criticized Trump for blatantly disregarding the many different techniques they used, from voter suppression and hackers to fake stories.” I believe Trump understands that,” she said.  ,
” In truth, the next day Democrats totally accepted the legitimacy of a presidential poll they lost was in 1988″, wrote The Federalist’s editor-in-chief Mollie Hemingway in Skewed: How the Media, Big Tech and the Democrats Seized Our Elections.
During the vice presidential debate between Vance and Walz, moderator Norah O’Donnell demanded that Vance respond that he would” get to challenge this year’s vote effects.” Walz was not asked by her to decide whether or not he would acknowledge the outcomes of a Trump-Vance victory.  ,
In a” ca n’t we all get along” speech, Walz resisted repressing the need to question the outcome of elections.  ,
” When this is over, we need to shake hands, this election, and the champion needs to be the success”, the communist said. ” This has got to stop. It’s tearing our country apart” . ,
Vance had the right to bring Walz to light on the duplicity of the Democrat Party.  ,
We must keep in mind that Democrats have protested the effects of votes for years in this country. Hillary Clinton claimed in 2016 that Vladimir Putin had stolen Donald Trump’s election because the Russians had purchased$ 500, 000 worth of Facebook advertising, according to Vance. This has been going on for a while. And if we want to suggest we need to value the results of the election, I’m on board. But if we want to say, as Tim Walz is saying, that this is just a problem that Republicans have had, I do n’t buy that” . ,
Voters should n’t buy it, either. Less than two months before Election Day, it’s crucial to know where the Democratic Party presidential candidate is in. Thus The Federalist is asking.  ,
Did you accept the election results if you lose, Vice President Harris?  ,
For more poll information and updates, visit , electionbriefing.com.
Matt Kittle covers The Federalist’s top votes coverage. An award-winning analytical writer and 30-year former of print, broadcast, and online media, Kittle formerly served as the executive director of Empower Wisconsin.