Democrats ‘ efforts to rig the election in their favor, much like they did four years ago, have marked the election cycle of 2024. As we approach November 5, these mostly unsuccessful attempts reek of anguish despite left-wing power of the election process and media focused on Democrat triumph.
Noncitizens and the Justice Department
Liberals and their media allies have been spreading the false impression that noncitizens who register to vote or ballot in U.S. elections are a made-up trouble, citing mounting evidence to the contrary.
According to The Federalist, hundreds of noncitizens have appeared on voter rolls all over the nation. Democrats and the Biden-Harris administration switched from insisting that noncitizen voting does n’t happen to opposing these election integrity efforts in multiple states, essentially working to keep noncitizens on the voter rolls before the 2024 election as a result of Republicans ‘ efforts to protect U.S. elections from noncitizen interference.
For instance, earlier this month, the Biden-Harris Justice Department sued Virginia, alleging that its efforts to remove foreigners from its vote lists prior to the 2024 election were against the law. On Friday, a Democrat-appointed federal prosecutor ordered Virginia to restore 1, 500 supposedly” self-identified” noncitizens onto the voter rolls, as The Federalist reported, and a Biden and Obama-appointed three-judge board upheld the decision Sunday. The state is now asking the Supreme Court of the United States to reject those judgments and order the Commonwealth to eliminate the” self-identified” foreign nationals from the rolls.
The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility ( SAVE ) Act, which was introduced earlier this year, would have changed federal election laws so that people could cast ballots in federal elections without having to present documentary proof of citizenship, but 14 Republicans joined the majority of House Democrats in ultimately absolving the bill less than two months before Election Day.
Business Media and the Censorship Program
The corporate media enablers of Democrat attempts to deceive the public into believing lies are real, refute accurate information, and use lies to defend the Harris strategy have been in full swing this period, perhaps even more so than in 2020.
The advertising press has excitedly compared Trump’s Sunday rally to a Nazi gathering in its most recent violent attempt to improve the Democrat agenda. This came less than a week after propaganda Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, published a fabricated struck part about Trump’s relations with a Gold Star home. Additionally, the article featured highly debunked assertions made by former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, who claimed Trump had wished for” the kind of commanders that Hitler had.”
Last year, Harris continued the language that has already sparked two assassination efforts against the former president and current Republican candidate by selling these claims to the American people from the steps of her established Washington, D.C. house, perpetuating the type of language that has already led to two death attempts against the former president and current Republican nomination.
Following his disappointing conversation effectiveness against Trump in June, left-wing media also played a significant role in staging a palace revolution against Biden. After they found a replacement member for Harris, they rigged her single argument against Trump, which the ABC News editors called “practically equaling an in-kind contribution to the Harris plan,” as The Federalist’s John Daniel Davidson wrote.
After hiring Harris, the commercial media even permitted the nomination to go months without sat down for interviews or push conferences, aside from those that were improbably helpful and careless with interviewers.
When CBS News allegedly interview-edit-scandal/”>selectively edited her “60 Minutes” meeting with Bill Whitaker, giving Harris a more express appearance than she really was, was one of the most severe instances of the advertising media using her as support for Harris. The decision raised concerns about possible media collaboration with the Harris strategy and the alleged campaign ploy to conceal the nominee’s incoherence from the American public.
While media outlets smugly try to deceive Americans into believing that Harris will succeed in 2024, congressional Democrats have been demanding that Big Tech conglomerates halt sharing of information on social media and other channels, little like they did in 2020. And Big Tech seems willing to comply, only this year, YouTube kept podcaster Joe Rogan’s key interview with Trump out of search results.
Lawfare
The numerous, boldly left-wing prosecutors and judges who are trying their best to rig the election are another group of people trying to rig the election.
Democrats attempted to remove Trump from the vote, but after those efforts failed, they immediately turned to lawfare against the previous president. They have, however, been engaged in trying to remove or stay third-party individuals, like Cornel West or Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., on vote in swing states, in an effort to assist Kamala Harris ‘ chances of winning.
Left-wing lawyers and Biden’s Department of Justice have charged Trump in some states and the District of Columbia. A slanted and coached Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records brought by District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who had a “go]ing ] after the former president, at the behest of a Democrat judge earlier this year.
The investigation into Trump’s First Amendment rights by special lawyers Jack Smith and his Biden-Harris Justice Department, which is perhaps the most well-known lawfare situation in terms of election meddling, is the most notable.
Because absentee ballots were already being circulated throughout the state, Smith released a 165-brief full of falsehoods about Trump on October 2. According to The Federalist, the intention behind a move weeks prior to the election was to “award the greatest possible social damage to a Republican presidential candidate.”
Despite the fact that the majority of Smith’s novel brief’s information was only recycled “headlines-before-election/” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>old news,” the media apparatus treated it as brand-new, pumping out title after title about the so-called “damning details.”
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee who has given Smith every latitude to carry on his program, including by unsealing heavily edited “evidence” brought by Smith against Trump earlier this month. Although the “evidence” did not back up Smith’s exhausted state in the case, Chutkan made it public less than three days before the election.
For more poll information and updates, visit , electionbriefing.com.
Breccan F. Thies is an primaries journalist for The Federalist. He formerly covered problems of culture and education for Breitbart News and the Washington Examiner. He is a 2022 Claremont Institute Publius Fellow and holds a degree from the University of Virginia. You may pursue him on X: @BreccanFThies.
