There are close races in the presidential contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. There is a parallel contest between the polls regarding who gets the most accurate information about the results. The pollsters are using their numbers to make predictions about a close race, according to researcher Nate Silver, who recently said that there are no risks in the event of a Trump or Kamala success.
Nate Silver had a toss-up contest in mind from the beginning, but he revealed his opinion in October that Donald Trump would prevail.
Allan Lichtman, an American University professor who accurately predicted nine out of the last ten national elections, holds the title of the Nostradamus of the US election in a mast opposition position. According to Liptman, Kamala Harris did win the election.
Nate Silver vs Allan Lichtman
Allan Lichtman relies on 13 locks, and Kamala Harris was away of Trump, which is another strategy. Gold and Lichtman battled over their strategies, as Silver claimed that Lichtman’s strategy was more favorable to Donald Trump than he was projecting a victory for Kamala Harris.
Both Silver and Lichtman have speaking engagements with them, and both have a history of success. Except for George W. Bush and Al Gore’s presidential election in 2000, Lederman predicted nine out of the ten primaries that have followed since 1984. Nate Silver’s type in 2008 estimates properly the result of the national vote in 49 out of 50 states. Since then, his unit accurately predicted the outcomes for 2012 and 2020. In 2016 but, he got it wrong as his design suggested a possible success for Hillary Clinton.
Experts disagree on which strategy is better, but one may find it to be incorrect because they are placing bets on foe individuals in this election.
