Why the Media Spin on the German Christmas Market Attack Can’t Be Trusted

The coverage of events by the mainstream media typically predates the media’s unique perception of the world, not the reality. This is not the case with the recent car attack at a Christmas market in Magdeburg, Germany, on Friday. In reality, the media’s portrayal of this one is actually more perverse than usual.

The attacker, a Royal doctor named Taleb al-Abdulmohsen, who has lived in Germany for years, is alleged to be an ex-Muslim who defied German officials for allowing so many Muslims into the country. According to the Washington Post, Abdulmohsen “had expressed anti-Islam opinions and described himself as a Saudi separatist.” According to The Wall Street Journal, he was” a well-known anti-Islam advocate who seems to have felt increasingly persecuted by Germany.” The New York Post also called him an “anti-Islam advocate”.

Some, however, presented many details that don’t match the media spin. Maral Salmassi, who calls herself a “politically wrong, Iranian/German businessman and maker”, wrote:

Taleb Al Abdulmohsen is not an ex-Muslim unbeliever, nor is he a fan of the AfD or Elon Musk, despite statements made by the German press. Although he may have personally distributed this false information, it concords with the Taqqiye, an Islamist practice that allows deception and lying to advance religious goals. &nbsp,

In fact, he is a radical Shia Muslim, as demonstrated by his name and several posts and chat leaks that have been circulated on Arabic-speaking platforms like X. Strangely, a Saudi girl brought his plans to the notice of German authorities. Tragically, the policeman ignored her instructions. &nbsp,

Salmassi provided proof that Abdulmohsen supported Hamas, that he threatened a Saudi ex-Muslim, and that he had even been reported to German authorities for telling them to carry out his attack ( those authorities ignored the warning ).

&nbsp, &nbsp, &nbsp, Related: &nbsp, New UK Play Reveals the Gulf Between the Left’s Thoughts and Truth

However, Abdulmohsen did maintain a presence in lines that were important of Islam, presenting himself as an ex-Muslim. What exactly is happening here? There are a number of options and things to keep in mind.

1. Motorized warfare is a well-known practice that dates back a long way. It has been demanded by IS. It is not a popular exercise among any&nbsp, non-Islamic&nbsp, legal or criminal business.

2. Saudi Arabia, where Abdulmohsen is from, is a center of warfare action. That, of course, doesn’t imply that he was a jihadist, but it almost certainly means that he was exposed to the jihadi view. &nbsp,

3. Islam has beliefs that advocate war against nonbelievers. Notice Qur’an 8: 39, 9: 5, 9: 29, and many other lines. For a summary of just some of them, view below. This is not just a matter of a dozen proof-texts, either. It is a basic text for Islamic philosophy in all jurisdictional schools and sects. Assistant Professor at the International Islamic University in Islamabad, Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee. According to the twelfth-century Maliki judge Ibn Rushd, who cited the book’s 1994 book,” Muslim scholars agreed that the purpose of fighting with the People of the Book is either their conversion to Islam or the settlement of jizyah.” Nyazee concludes:” This leaves no doubt that the main purpose of the Muslim group, in the eye of its scholars, is to spread the word of Allah through warfare, and the option of poll-tax]jizya ] is to be exercised just after subjection” of non-Muslims.

4. In some instances, Islam has beliefs that encourage fraud. &nbsp,

5. Jewish organizations have been calling for the annual Christmas market problems in Germany for years.

6. This time, a number of jihadi plots against Christmas businesses have already been foiled.

7. Muslim demonstrators just screamed” Allahu akbar” and” There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messiah” through a German Christmas market.

8. &nbsp, But however, &nbsp, the defendant has been claiming to be an ex-Muslim — and a Zionist! — and has contacted some anti-jihad internet images, asking them to meeting him. This leads to many opportunities.

a. that he was a genuine ex-Muslim and Zionist and that he had the guts to attack a group of jihadis in a way that they frequently attack without explanation.

b. He was lying, in readiness for his warfare attack.

c. He was a genuine ex-Muslim, but in a moment of personal crisis returned to Islam, and realized that he had to do a great deed to outweigh his apostasy on Allah’s big judgment scales ( Qur’an 21: 47 ). No contract is more important than jihad, according to Muhammad, but he launched a terrorism attack.

d. Or nevertheless, he merely snapped, has some schizophrenic episode, etc. In that situation, it’s interesting to note that his wish to “revenge” led him to imitate a typical behavior of the soldiers of the church he claimed to have abandoned.

Of those four options, the first one is the least probable. Why? Because he was an ex-Muslim who went insane, he would have been much more likely to include targeted Muslims than to have chosen a favorite jihadi destination. The creation media will always be critical of his ex-Muslim beliefs and not take into account the possibility of fraud or a returning to Islam. They do so because they are unaware of those options and because they consistently take precautions to prevent violence committed against Islam in its name and in accordance with its doctrines. However, their assertions in this situation are pretty flimsy. At best. As often.

Source credit