Elon Musk, a tycoon, has backed Poornima Ramarao’s promises that Suchir Balaji’s strange fatality was a result of foul play.
Ramarao, the mother of a 26-year-old Indian-origin tech researcher and former OpenAI staff, has called for an FBI investigation, arguing that facts uncovered through a private autopsy and research casts fear on the officer’s assumption of death.
Ramarao shared her fears, writing,” Suchir’s house was ransacked, sign of conflict in the bathroom and looks like one hit him in bath based on blood areas. It’s a cold-blooded mu*d*r declared by regulators as death. Lobbying in SF capital doesn’t prevent us from getting judges. We demand FBI analysis”
In reply, Musk voiced his assistance, posting,” This doesn’t seem like a suicide”.
Following Musk’s opinions, Ramarao reached up to him, asking for additional help in the case.
The investor who co-founded OpenAI and later parted way with the business had earlier posted about the event, causing more debate to surround Balaji’s sudden death.
A complete and clear investigation, as well as stronger protections for those who raise social concerns within the tech industry, have been called upon by popular AI ethics advocates and creators by the tragedy.
Balaji, a respectable number in the digital world, was known for his vital stance on AI techniques. He made articles in an interview with The New York Times in October, where he expressed concerns about trademark violations by leading AI companies. After resigning from OpenAI in August due to social conflicts, Balaji became a vital figure in the publication’s rights case against the business.
Balaji was found dead in his San Francisco house on November 26 days after his 26th day. According to CCTV film that showed him alone at the moment, the San Francisco police determined his death to be murder.
However, his followers have raised serious questions about his death’s situation. Ramarao’s contact for an FBI analysis is gaining significant speed and help from the general public despite the San Francisco officer’s claim that there is no evidence of foul play.
