U. S. safety firms have spent hundreds of millions of dollars investigating, prosecuting, and jailing Americans for praying in public and walking into Congress. That’s a lot of energy that has been diverted from legitimate national security concerns like the alleged extremist who killed 15 people in New Orleans last week and Congress’s wide-open borders.
Hostage foreign agents undoubtedly used that open borders to encroach on the country, which also led to another terrorist attack on October 26 in Chicago. It’s fair to anticipate more terrorist attacks coming from the open border, perhaps years, given the lack of just basic security settings for the past four years. Additionally, there are the potential for angry foreign governments to have embedded tissues.
After September 11th, we were informed that in order to prevent terrorism, we needed a new U.S. Department of Homeland Security and many other expansions of the U.S. security condition, such as the expanded Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Weapons aren’t the only rest that Americans were sold in that time, it turns out.
However, strong individuals within our own government engaged in terror to advance their own political goals rather than properly prosecute evildoers, making them involved with the terrorists. How many security agreements does peace sign? Not as many as battle. Dead and frightened Americans are great for the military-industrial difficult — and for its innovative shoulder, the censorship-industrial challenging.
The Biden presidency reorganized the repression building Barack Obama built that expanded during Donald Trump’s second term in four years. It transformed national intellect and law enforcement into dissenting officers. Democrats ‘ home rivals, who were independent and Republican voters, were their greatest danger, no actual jihadists.
National surveillance agencies have a budget of$ 267 million to judge online talk, according to the Biden administration. That just scratches the surface of the protection resources that have been diverted by the Obama administration to policing people’s opinions, including numerous instances of speech and protest that are constitutionally protected. Americans who are allegedly held accountable for expressing truth about Covid-19, were censored for their remarks, and prosecuted for their opposition to school closures and helmet requirements.
The United States Department of Justice has spent an estimated$ 500,000 on prosecuting Americans for largely trespassing crimes on public property, but it has failed to prosecute Democrat allies ‘ nationwide firebombings and Main Street destruction that took place just months prior. Its FBI has prioritized shock-and-awe prosecutions of trespass mothers around, apparently, checking into the pro-jihadi posts of an Afghanistan senior living in a heavily Muslim immigrant community.
According to the Twitter Files, DHS and the FBI spent thousands of taxpayer-funded hours attempting to find Americans who were silent online and demanding that large tech companies remove their websites and social media accounts. To assure compliance, they convene “industry meetings” between big tech monopolies and national security agencies. The CISA, or Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, is DHS’s sub-agency that is the heart of global repression initiatives that continue to this day.
After Elon Musk purchased Online, the Biden administration and other entities that frequently operate independently of the executive branch and Congress were undoubtedly unable to prevent this. They didn’t have to. Members of Congress almost always prefer padding their re-election resources over upholding their vows to defend the Constitution, and the Supreme Court pretended it couldn’t see the administrative state misconduct it can see in every other situation.
It’s not like authority has changed at any of the other big tech companies, both. Mark Zuckerberg may be apologizing to Trump for allowing a baby to escape a cat-stuffed case for Joe Rogan, but he doesn’t claim to have killed his company’s censorship algorithms, which have been edited by U.S. security agencies.
According to the Twitter Files and House studies, the FBI and DHS organize censorship activities through dozens of apparently private organizations that are funded by tax dollars. A new document from a House investigation explains:
The Department of Homeland Security’s ( DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ( CISA ) and the State Department’s Global Engagement Center ( GEC ) collaborated with Stanford University and “disinformation” pseudo-scientists to create the Election Integrity Partnership ( EIP), which attempted to censor Americans ‘ online speech before and after the 2020 election in order to combat alleged “misinformation” and foreign malign influence. The EIP collaborated directly with the content moderation teams at social media companies, giving priority to the EIP’s repression demands. To eliminate or demote thousands of Americans ‘ online content, including accurate information, quips, and political views, the EIP made certain repression recommendations to social media companies.
Homeland Security and State greatly account online “listening” tools that flag talk for repression. Why these pricey tech tools didn’t flag the alleged New Orleans terrorist’s alleged alleged alleged alleged alleged alleged alleged alleged New Orleans terrorist’s public Facebook posts as a sign of loyalty to a foreign terrorist organization is a mystery. Islamists no longer make up the top priority for federal” security” agencies that are influenced by a cultural Marxist ideology that demonizes white people, or perhaps they did flag him.
Or perhaps federally edited surveillance and censorship algorithms politicize and falsify reality in a manner similar to the ridiculous AI-generated Google Gemini images showing the African and Eskimos of the Founding Fathers. According to a recently released House AI censorship report, the Biden administration’s AI laws may have contributed to that stark-reality distortion.
Could those same AI regulations and , the leftist ideology distorting Big Tech be affecting surveillance algorithms, not to mention national security professionals? Or, more directly, did these expensive surveillance tools ignore Shamsud-Din Jabbar’s jihadi posts because he’s a brown Muslim? It wouldn’t be a surprise at all, given how woke national security agencies have become.
How effective can a national security apparatus that goes above and beyond to guard jihadis and illegal border crossings in accordance with leftist ideology? And the fact that these algorithms were politicized right away indicates that they will always be.
Democrats began to see half of their fellow Americans as the enemy when Donald Trump won the election in 2016. The national security apparatus credentialed this shocking, anti-American narrative. Freedom of information law firms and congressional committees have been forced to file lawsuits after being able to obtain public records that showed that national security agencies focused on Democrats ‘ political opponents rather than real security threats. Despite four-years of valiant citizen efforts to obtain public documents, the investigations have only begun.
Americans were told after Sept. 11, 2001, that we had to sacrifice historical rights for safety, including the obviously constitutional right for security agencies to demand probable cause before spying on us. The same government that used 9/11 ( and the Cold War ) as a pretext for overturning foreigners ‘ right to self-rule then used Donald Trump’s election, Brexit, and Covid to dramatically expand its power and further limit ours.
Federal organizations have revoked American freedoms in the name of “national security” while exposing the border to the worst security threat in American history. Now it is obvious that Americans have both lost both our freedom and security.
The same people, institutions, and ideologies that can’t keep our constitutionally binding rights to free speech and life, insist that doubting their competence is a sign of “domestic extremism.” Anyone who doesn’t doubt their level of competence at this point must be overcome or mentally ill.
National security agencies failing to deter actual terrorists despite having hundreds of billions of dollars in manpower and equipment and unprecedented “whole-of-society” surveillance powers is obvious from the evidence. Remember: the purpose of a system is what it does, not what it says.
