Anita Bryant, Christian activist, song, and orange juice image, died on Dec. 16, 2024, at 84. If you searched her name, but, all you do hear about her is that she was an anti-gay hypocrite who once had a pizza thrown in her mouth. Was she only a symbol of right-wing hatred, Holy hatred against gay people, or a remnant of the long-lost perfect of American cultural conservatism? Apparently, knowing what we know now, she was n’t as bad as we might think.
In an Specialist essay titled, “For Anita Bryant, there will be no orange juices in heaven, ” the author information, “She had no reputation other than as one who espoused and preached love. That is all she may become remembered for. ” He continues, “ When I heard that she died, all I may think about was that Satan himself greeted her with a pizza in the face upon her entrance to heaven. ”
The legendary pizza event occurred in October 1977 in Des Moines, Iowa, where she was giving a news event opposing efforts to make it illegal to discriminate against homosexuals in choosing. She noted in the meeting, “Because if you don’t celebrate it, who’s going to know you’re queer or no, you see? What they wanted to do was to flaunt it and to never lose their jobs because of it. ”
As she explained that her party, Save Our Children, was not attempting to “do apart” with gays, and that work to speak on the issue had been met with protests, a man appeared and hit her in the face with a banana cream dessert. The police quickly grabbed the gentleman, but Bryant and her father urged for the person to be let go and not pressed fees. Bryant reportedly prayed for the person, asking for God to give him from his “deviant life. ”
This moment may identify her political activism and get a frequent point of ridicule and party for the LGBT movement for decades. She is thought to have energized the very thought of a Christian political activity, launching the religious straight and the work throughout the 1980s to restore social norms across society. But, at that moment in time, being forthright had a value. She lost labor, was blacklisted, and became an emblem of anti-gay hatred and intolerance. She had afterwards admit to being so overcome she considered taking her personal life.
She argued that the gay community was interested in recruiting younger people, and she championed what would become a cornerstone of liberal opposition to the LGBT action through Christian Biblical claims. She referred to homosexuality as an “abomination ” and supported therapy as a viable solution.
But as I read the Advocate article and some just like it that positioned her worldview as unacceptably cruel and as dangerous in 1977 as it would be considered today, I may n’t help but notice a video in the corner of the screen interviewing a gay music artist in hobby clothing surrounding by mostly nude men wearing dog masks and wonder if she was really as bigoted as she is accused of being.
In a May 21, 1977, article in The Toronto Star subtitled, “She loves orange juice and loathes homosexuals, ” she is quoted saying, “America is being morally changed through drugs, pornography … the language, the subtle undermining of what a family is. ” She continued, “Even in a public library you can get a stack of books two feet high that condone lesbians. ” Interestingly, she notes, “[ I]t might even get to the point where it [homosexuality ] would be normal, and straight heterosexual life, as God instituted it, would be abnormal. ”
Bryant argued, “ But when it comes to the point of the local ordinance, that we have to hire flaunting homosexuals to teach our children, that ’s where I draw the line. I mean people who are role models being able to stand up and say, ‘I’m a homosexual and I’m proud of it, ’ implying to our children that they have another legitimate choice open to them. It’s not a civil rights issue at all. ”
It is striking how relevant her words are today after watching dozens upon dozens of LGBT activist teachers quite literally flaunt their sexual and transgender identities with the express purpose of encouraging young kids to know they have many identity options to choose from.
From her point of view, as many conservatives and parents find themselves understanding today, what else could she think? In 1977, the gay community was mostly men engaging in public displays of sexual fetishism. A look back at the media gay men produced, as detailed in a fairly tame article titled, “Discovering the ‘Gay Lifestyle ’ through 1970s Magazines, ” any objective person would understand the concerns focusing on social morality and exposure to kids.
As we see today, the gay/queer activist movement chose sexual liberation as their focus. They wanted to normalize the idea of sexuality as itself a virtue and for youth to be exposed to this idea. The arguments surrounding gay civil rights seemed more out of spite than legitimate activism. Rather than sitting down and discussing their concerns, they protested and threw pies.
One thing all the articles today leave out, though, is what Bryant said about gay people, rather than homosexuality or the political movement. In the Toronto Star, she noted, “I’ve worked around homosexuals all my life. … I’ve known many of them to be warm, sensitive people, and I’d have no hesitation in having them around my children. ” When she began praying for the man who assaulted her with a pie, who would go on to be a celebrated gay activist for decades, she and her husband said, “We love him, ” with her husband repeating, “We forgive you and we love you. I don’t want this man touched or harmed in any way. ”
When she began praying, she lost her words, crying — I am certain — from the weight of opposition and hatred that surrounded her and her work. You could feel her collapse for just a moment, and that moment has always haunted me: a real person in a real moment of genuine pain, faced with genuine hatred.
I don’t think Anita Bryant hated gay people. I don’t think her activism was bigoted or harmful, either. We may cringe at her language today, but what other choice did she have in the world the gay activists showed her and would continue to show everyone over the next decade? I think of the conservatives and parents today who seem to be right in the same moment she found herself in, fighting the same left-wing extremism and facing the same accusations and vitriol.
I think Anita Bryant deserves to be remembered for the work she did to stand up to the left-wing extremism she and her community faced, which we today call LGBT. I do think her legacy is more than what her opponents have written for her. It lives in those today combatting trans activism and sexually explicit materials for kids, child exploitation, the displacement of women and girls, and so many other battles one is accused of “hate” for fighting.
Chad Felix Greene is a senior contributor to The Federalist. He is the author of” Surviving Gender: My Journey Through Gender Dysphoria,” and is a social writer focusing on truth in media, conservative ideas and goals, and true equality under the law. You can follow him on Twitter @chadfelixg.
