The US has formally announced its withdrawal from the World Health Organization ( WHO ), citing the organization’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, perceived political influences, and financial disparities among member nations.
The choice, outlined in an executive order signed on January 20, 2025, marks a major policy change, reversing the previous administration ’s determination to enter the global health system. According to the administrative order, the departure is motivated by the WHO’s failing to acquire vital reforms, mishandling of global health crises, and rely on financing overwhelmingly provided by the US.
” The WHO has demonstrated an inability to act freely from the social effect of its member state,” the order says, highlighting differences in monetary contributions. For example, despite having a population of 1. 4 billion, China contributes roughly 90 % less to the WHO than the US.
Important rules of the professional buy include:
- Halting US Contributions: The US will stop coming financing and assistance to the WHO and redistribute these resources to” believable and open” domestic and international health efforts.
- Personnel Change: US employees already involved in WHO actions may be recalled or reassigned.
- Pandemic Response Management: A new US-led model for public health and security may be established under the National Security Council.
- Review of Global Health Strategy: The 2024 US Global Health Security Strategy will be replaced with a revised policy.
The order also instructs the Secretary of State to notify the United Nations and the WHO of the withdrawal and halt participation in negotiations related to the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement and amendments to International Health Regulations.
This move follows years of tension between the US and the WHO, with critics arguing that the organization mishandled early warnings about COVID-19, failed to hold member nations accountable, and allowed political pressures to undermine its credibility.
The withdrawal has sparked debate among health experts and policymakers. Supporters argue the decision reclaims US sovereignty over global health initiatives and addresses financial inequities. Opponents warn it could undermine global efforts to combat pandemics and weaken US influence in international health governance.
The withdrawal process is expected to take effect in accordance with international protocols, with the administration emphasizing its commitment to safeguarding global health through alternative partnerships.
