Judge rejects the school’s request to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the First Amendment protects” controversial academic conversation.”
A federal judge on Friday refused to reject a free conversation lawsuit alleging that Ohio State University improperly fired a doctor for using the n-word in a school with a contentious discussion.
The former teacher, Mark Sullivan, used” the n-word for an academic purpose” and” that conversation is protected” under the First Amendment, U. S. District Judge Michael Watson wrote, according to an extract from the judgement published at Cause.
Sullivan wants his career up and damages from the university because it fired him in 2021.
For many years, Sullivan taught a training called” Crucial Conversations” to support kids” to communicate effectively about challenging topics”, according to the court’s choice:
Individuals begin by criticizing bullying video clips in one-on-one and class activities before finally engaging in difficult conversations themselves. Some of these models involved belittle conflict—complete with consciously triggering, controversial, rude, or shocking language. Sullivan had in improve warned his students that the activities would use such language. The idea behind this teaching is that a class role play creates a low-stakes atmosphere conducive to the development of linguistic skills.
In a role-playing circumstance he used the n-word to portray organized crime supervisor Whitey Bulger during a course in the fall of 2021.
According to the situation, the situation and language served as an illustration that he had used repeatedly in different classes without incident.
This day, however, a student complained to the school, and officials launched an investigation, as a result, Sullivan alleges the organization refused to renew his contract.
In its activity to reject his complaint, the universities alleged Sullivan’s use of the racist slur was” so destructive that it impeded OSU’s ability to fulfill its commitments”, the judge wrote.
But, Judge Watson disagreed with the school’s explanation.
Why did OSU and Defendants permit Sullivan to say the n-word 48 times before during a Whitey Bulger role play if it was so destructive? he wrote.
The judge decided Sullivan’s event may resume, writing,” The First Amendment forbids people institutions from dismissing instructors because of controversial scientific speech”.
Responding, a George Washington University law professor described Watson’s decision as “very strong” in support of “free speech and academic freedom”.
According to Professor Jonathan Turley on his blog,” It is also a compelling reason why Ohio State University needs to have its own” crucial Conversation” on how it treats free speech.
MORE: ‘ N-word’ notes at Rhodes College were a hoax
IMAGE: University of College/Shutterstock
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
