It’s like a picture straight out of a Frank Capra film. In a mini-filibuster to combat the forces of darkness and cruel, valiant Senate Democrats took control of the ground on Wednesday evening and into Thursday night. Or things.
Advertisement
Why are Democrats exhausting themselves, losing sleep. and possibly missing breakfast ( despite the lack of any evidence that Democrats would ever choose to skip a supper )? They have to try to block Donald Trump’s “most risky nominee”.
It’s not who you think Liberals think is the “most risky” Trump option. It’s no RFK, nor is it fresh Attorney General Pam Bondi.  ,
Liberals believe that the mild-mannered, self-described devout Christian candidate for budget chairman, Russell Vought, is” the most risky” Trump candidate.
” Russell Vought was born to create bribery healthy again”, said rookie Sen. Andy Kim, Democrat from New Jersey.
Whenever a Democrat from New Jersey deals about” corruption”, grab your wallet and plug up your wife and daughters.
Sen. Kim is never sticking to the text. Democrats claim that Vought’s genuine opposition comes from his association with the Death Star programs, er, Project 2025. When Project 2025 was being written, Vought worked for the Heritage Foundation.  ,
He is also a” Christian republican”. In order to achieve this, Vought wants to instill Christian values into every federal official and place a cross there. Well, probably not that last part, but you get the idea.
Being a Christian undoubtedly means he wants to die people, children, and old people.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N) said,” Picture a universe where Russell Vought and the DOGE team work together, and it’s a group that can do for damage and pain for America.” Y. ).
Advertisement
What would it mean for the students who struggle to get a nice dinner if they collaborated to get rid of the money they claimed was useless? They’ll suggest it’s useless. Or the families who struggle to pay shopping and the stuff we do to try to keep food prices along, they’ll say it’s wasteful”, Schumer added.
Video to 1981, when TipO’Neil, the rotund Irishman, demanded that the House’s budget cuts be rejected by Democrats because they would make elderly people eat dog food.  ,
Democrats are older dogs who use old techniques. Exaggerating and lying about Trump’s plan didn’t labor during the election and won’t work today.
Related: AOC’s Weird Rant Where She Calls Elon Musk’ Unintelligent ‘
The “mini-filibuster” is negative political theatre.
In an effort to demonstrate that they are fighting against Vought’s election, at least 30 Democratic lawmakers may take part in a 30-hour talkathon. There’s virtually everything Democrats can do to prevent Vought’s verification, but they can delay it. Democrats can stifle the process in a communications play to inform about the threat that they claim Vought poses as the head of the organization that President Donald Trump is attempting to consolidate power while Republicans hold the Senate by a majority of 53-47.
A year after an OMB letter instructing agencies to temporarily halt almost all federal grants, loans, and additional financial help to beneficiaries was released, Vought’s election will be subject to a final Senate vote. This is in an effort to determine whether the saving complies with the government’s agenda. The White House rescinded the letter to “end distress” after it faced legal problems. Syllabus was not officially in charge of the organization at the time, but the White House made it known that he was.
Advertisement
The United States government’s operations and people are free from the position and religion if they are attempting to instill Christian values into their operations and people. Nothing will make anyone believe that their god is worshipped in a certain way and that any suggestion would be dishonest.
And he’ll probably be a good director of OMB as long as Vought you matter to ten without using his fingers.
