The main point is not in debate: Taylor Swift, a madly favorite song, really got booed at the Super Bowl. While different instances of such situations have involved tense debates over whether the shouts or the shouts were louder, the boos and the cheers were both loud in this one. Both leftists and patriots have acknowledged that Swift was booed. Why simply she was booed, however, is a matter of tremendous debate, and now the far-left Glamour publication has come up with a concept that is as ridiculous and absurd as it was repetitive: it’s all the problem of one Donald J. Trump of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D. C. If you didn’t see that coming, you’ve been asleep since 2015.
Advertisement
The shouting of Swift, an passionate supporter of both Old Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, was just another example of the strengthening of the media’s grip on American popular culture, according to an article I published on Monday titled” Taylor Swift Summed Up What the Left Is Thinking After Three Days of Trump.” Many commenters, however, insisted that Swift was only booed because she is linked romantically with Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs, and the New Orleans Superdome, where the Super Bowl was played, was filled with many more fans of the Philadelphia Eagles ( or” Elgses”, as Philadelphia Mayor Cherelle Parker spells it ) than of the Chiefs.
That may be all it was, but as I pointed out in that article, a poll revealed that Swift had clearly lost aid after making her far-left-leaning statements public. Now, Glamour newspaper, which looks at the problem from the other side of the political spectrum, has come to the conclusion that the screaming had at least something to do with her politics. However, Glamour goes much further and asserts that Orange Man Bad’s entire incident is yet another example of its oppressive cultural influence.
Yes, it’s absurd. Of course, it’s absurd. This is the left we’re talking about.
Full of the left’s usual presumption, arrogance, and hysteria, Glamour entitled its article, which came out Monday,” Why Taylor Swift Getting Booed at the Super Bowl was Even More Chilling Than You Think”. Now, wait a minute. Taylor Swift getting booed was” chilling”? And Glamour assumes that its hapless readers will undoubtedly agree that this is because it is so certain of it.
Advertisement
That’s only the beginning of the craziness. There have been several times I felt chilled by the rapid increase in misogyny seeping in our culture, writes author Stephanie McNeal, who is undoubtedly daubing the tears from her cheeks all the while. However, Taylor Swift’s performance at Super Bowl LIX, which was booed by a crowd of thousands on Sunday night, was a new low. And you assumed it was all because she was a fan of the Chiefs. Come on, man!
McNeal pulls rank, saying:” I was there at the game. When Swift’s face appeared on the Jumbotron, an almost instant—and distinctly male—dissent erupted from around me. Swift, of course, was there to support her boyfriend, and was far from the only celebrity in attendance. Nearly every time there was a break in the play, with virtually no response from the audience, the screen showed a new famous person, from Paul McCartney to Anne Hathaway and Lady Gaga.
Well, sure because none of those people are so closely associated with one of the teams, and even though they are all likely leftists, none of them were said to be supporting a candidate for president by getting their name chosen. Additionally, McNeal doesn’t bother to explain why the crowd keeping quiet for Anne Hathaway and Lady Gaga wasn’t supporting that misogyny because Swift is being booed as a result of rising Trump-inspired misogyny.
Advertisement
McNeal adds that in contrast to the booing of Swift,” as an image of the president, stonefaced and standing in a salute, was shown to the crowd during Jon Batiste’s national anthem performance, the roar of approval and cheers was deafening”. And:” To me, the disparate reactions felt like a message. Trump’s claim that the Super Bowl, one of the nation’s biggest cultural events, has been reclaimed and that he possesses the toxic masculinity he claims to possess. And he and his supporters appear to be “living for it”
 ,  ,  , Related:  , Taylor Swift Summed Up What the Left Is Thinking After Three Weeks of Trump
Oh, brother — sorry, McNeal, make that” Oh, sister”. Without ever trying to understand why Trump would be so popular with the Super Bowl crowd and why his popularity would have nothing to do with hating women, the Glamour article continues to lament Trump’s alleged misogyny for a long period of time.  ,
Instead, we get more of the same old same old:” In an era where Trump is singlehandedly dismantling decades of diversity, equity, and inclusion that generations of women, people of color, and queer people have fought for, the Super Bowl felt like a microcosm of a larger problem”.  ,
Yes. The problem is that people might actually start getting judged by the content of their character, instead of wearing their race, sex, perversion, or delusion as a badge of preferment. Anyone who genuinely admired the equality of all people would be applauding.
Advertisement