The very straightforward and sudden question posed to Albert Bourla was asked by CNBC, which typically runs cover for medical corporations as a matter of program:
Advertisement
Vaccine manufacturers like you are essentially immune to liability. What should be done if the items are safe and effective and if necessary, what happens if those spears are replaced or completely removed, and what happens if those weapons are still in place?
Elizabeth Warren DESTROYED by X Community Notes Over Pharma Corruption
If the vaccines are actually” safe and effective,” the obvious response would be,” Nothing happens if we lose our liability shield.” We don’t need it because our solution is safe and effective, and we can demonstrate that in court if necessary.
That’s not what Bourla said. Instead, he outlined a claim that the reputable FDA would not grant approval for a harmful and ineffective vaccine. Therefore, they are by concept” safe and effective” by virtue of the fact that the FDA authorized the release of COVID photos.
Additionally, he adds, American courts are too stupid to determine whether a person’s injuries resulted from a car accident or a vaccination.
If a product is unsafe and effective, it will never receive approval from the FDA or other health authorities, especially those for vaccines. But, in a system where litigations can develop, anyone can demand that the car accident occurred because of the vaccine, and then, uh, with a jury, it will be a flip of the coin. And this is why, in my opinion, the Congress passed legislation that shields individuals who have FDA approval from national responsibilities.
Advertisement
embedded content ]
Bourla’s security of the unjustified falls under the harshest scrutiny for so many reasons. When it hired a former major FDA drug regulation and appointed him as its chief medical officer, the firm was just kind enough to display one of them, the so-called “revolving door” between regulators at the organizations tasked with assessing pharma’s products and biotech itself.
via Stat News ( sheriff added ):
Although it’s just February, my choice for the Worst Biopharma CEO of 2025 has already been chosen: Pfizer’s Albert Bourla.  ,
One of the worst, most disastrous commercial missteps to occur in recent memory is the hiring of former Food and Drug Administration chief medical officer Patrizia Cavazzoni.
The pharmaceutical industry has been criticized for its overly cozy connection with the FDA for decades by the Make America Healthy Once activity and its titular head, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who also serves as the Department of Health and Human Services.
Study: COVID Shots Cripple Immune System Possibly Completely
The FDA regularly acknowledges that it has no idea how the products it approves operate in addition to the regulatory conflict of interest. This is especially true of the COVID-19 shots, which were never approved through the traditional process but rather received “emergency use approval” with a significantly lower safety show threshold.
Advertisement
The FDA asked Pfizer with revealing how much Spike Protein Their Vaccine Causes Cell Production and also How Long Does It Take to Produce Cells.
PFIZER:” Obviously, we don’t have a complete understanding of the way the vaccine works in terms of producing an immune response.” twitter.com/TakXP1Nw6e
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd ) February 7, 2025
