We are now living in a dangerous and common division. Donald Trump is dividing the US, the US government is dividing the democratic West, the far-right Alternative for Germany ( AfD ) party is dividing German society, immigration is a problem in Europe, and the world is divided over how to deal with climate change. According to observers, the gap between various social groups and complete nations is growing, and the world is becoming more divided.
The number of jobs requiring mutual action is growing at the same time. The world is affected by wars, conflicts, movement, trade, climate, social issues, and issues relating to industrial advancement without regard for divisions and gaps.
Political civilizations have long enjoyed the reputation of being more adept at tackling problems. It was assumed that if cultural issues were addressed boldly and simultaneously, there were a greater chance of developing effective solutions that received the support of a large majority.
However, this popularity has suffered in our increasingly divided earth. The social climate is becoming more intransigent, and there is less willingness to deal and reach agreements.
Nils Teichler, a sociologists from the German university Bremen, the Research Institute for Social Cohesion ( FGZ ) warns about the effects of polarization. Social compromises become difficult if groups within a community prevent one another, he told DW in an meeting.
The more social cohesion is threatened, he said, the more pre-established behaviour to a group are and the more markedly distinct differences in the degree of sympathy for various groups are based on merely individual traits.
common prejudices and AfD reputation
The university has discovered a striking finding in a recent study on social sector: divisive views extend far beyond the electorate’s boundaries. Simply put, in AfD hideouts, even those who don’t support the party have a bias against immigrants.
The researchers looked at the link between local triumphs of the AfD and a specific social group’s sympathies. We find that people in areas where the AfD was particularly socially productive tend to treat impoverished parties and social minorities with less compassion, according to Teichler.
He claimed that people with little schooling, Muslims, gay, lesbian, and other people who harbor the most damaging attitudes were mainly targeted at immigrants, Muslims, gay, gay, and non-binary people. That is because there are divisions in the AfD’s stronger parts, he said.
Which came first, the extreme right or the sector? The two go hand in hand, in Teichler’s opinion.
Instrumentalization of the relocation problem
The extreme right has likewise sounded a warning about social division. However, it names only one main motivating factor: movement. It promotes migration and calling for closed edges. Donald Trump, the president of the United States, consistently labels refugees as criminals and dangerous. Alice Weidel, the headscarf girl, has referred to Muslims as “headscarf women.”
For populist accents can also be heard in contemporary European nation. Friedrich Merz, the likely successor of the next German chancellor, has previously referred to children from immigrant communities as “little pashas,” a phrase that refers to Muslim communities.
According to Cihan Sinanoglu, the mind of the European Center for Integration and Migration Research ( DeZIM),” the shift to the right that we are seeing right now has affected nearly all celebrations.” Some of the most restrictive immigration and asylum laws are attributed to the center-left Social Democrats ( SPD), Greens, and the neoliberal Free Democrats ( FDP ), according to him.
Sinanoglu adds that it is incorrect to assume that imposing stringent laws would lead to the resuscitation of citizens from the far correct and their return to mainstream culture. According to him, these measures are not a means of reversing the AfD’s prejudiced plan.
” That is demonstrated by the case of eastern Germany, where much fewer migrants and people with “migrant background” reside than in the north of the nation,” he said. But, that is where the AfD strongholds are located, he claims.
Sociologist Sinanoglu welcomes open discussion about movement and the limitations of society’s capacity to deal with it. He claims that the focus on movement is a social failure in order to bridge social divides.
Common rejection
He warns that it is a failure that costs a lot, especially for the immigrant community.
” For instance, if we talk about irregular migration the entire time, refugees are very, very conscious of who is actually meant in these conversations: they themselves,” he claims. He claims that the majority of European culture adheres to rules that forbid immigrants despite having been there for decades.
He claims that the current situation is one of widespread social consequences: migrants are spiritually being denied citizenship. People are resigning, they are enduring concern, and they are considering immigrating. He claims that this strains our intimate relationships and friendships.
He has no doubts about the extreme right directing this sector. He claims that Western cultures make for makes very easy to find. That is because, in his opinion, the politicians in charge, whether in Germany, Britain, France, or the US, do not handle the real cause of social section in their cultures: social issues.
In response to abstract discussions on social cohesion, Sinanoglu says,” We have to talk about substantial problems, we have to rely on these social problems, and we must not keep up ideals and principles that will never apply to many elements of this society.” He claims that having access to decent housing, good wages, and opportunities to advance socially are what really mattered.
He claims that the debate over unity and stability in a society is incorrectly framed in terms of the movement issue. ” Whose security, truly, are we talking about? He claims that the same people who speak of safety and buy in terms of migration are those who have made the work market more unstable, created jobs more vulnerable, and contributed to the lack of protection in people’s lives in the first place.
The section in the Western world is a cause, Sinanoglu believes, of the increase of the far right. cultural section
