On Tuesday, the Senate confirmed Dr. Jay Bhattacharya as chairman of the National Institutes of Health, a victory for truthful scientific over lacked integrity and biased pseudo-science at the national stage.
Advertisement
The NIH’s past leadership undercut COVID-19 lockdowns and other government measures, which is why Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, two major NIH officials, were so eager to censor completely speech based on their awful policies. According to the Twitter Files, one of the target of tech-government repression cooperation during shutdowns was Bhattacharya. However, now that the situation has changed and the Trump administration has appointed the restricted doctor as head of NIH, it should be noted that the organization will finally no more prioritize autocratic government control over the scientific method.
” Great reports”! Robert Malone, an engineer and practitioner, applauded Bhattacharya’s confirmation. Vinay Prasad, a physician-scientist, praised Bhattacharya as” evidently qualified and the best candidate.” Senate Democrats should be ashamed to support Bhattacharya, according to doctor John Mandrola, who criticized the senators for saying,” How can 47 thinking people voting against a renowned academic and a Stanford professor?” Science ought to be unbiased. You all, come in.
No Democrat voted in favor of Dr. Bhattacharya’s confirmation as the NIH’s producer now, despite the fact that he was confirmed by a Democrat. The Democrats ‘ party’s dysfunction has reached the point where they are no longer able to cast votes solely on party lines. Shame on them. @DrJBhattacharya
— Robert W Malone, MD ( @RWMaloneMD) Mar 24, 2025
Advertisement
There is a new NIH Judge in town, folks!
Mike Davis, a legal professional and head of the Article III Project, stressed the significance of Bhattacharya’s validation on Truth Social. This is fantastic information. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya received vilification from the Covidians for doing what they were supposed to do every day [sic]: subject the technology. That is the medical approach.
Except if you’re more concerned with using taxpayer funds and attacking government authority, as past NIH officials were, especially under Biden. Davis emphasized the value of scientists who are passionate about conducting achievement research, citing this as a result of technological advancement and human development. And Bhattacharya was absolutely correct, and the Covidians were utterly negligent. How many people, especially the vulnerable, were unduly subject to COVID lockdowns, 6-foot social distancing, and other thoughtless and cruel measures?
More than one review came to the conclusion that lockdowns claimed far more existence than they saved. How many children, especially poor black children, have experienced learning loss, overlook, and abuse, Davis continued,” How some kids, especially poor black children, suffered learning loss, neglect, and abuse? How many older, especially the elderly, perished alone? How many Americans, particularly conservatives, were censored, debuffed, deplatformed, and fired for criticizing The Science ( this madness )? Justice may reform NIH and hold those responsible for the organization’s power and money-fraud guilty. Jay may restore technology to its former glory
Advertisement
The federal government should not be involved in any medical endeavors, but at the very least it does promote superior analysis over misinformation to back up predetermined and despotic government policies. Bhattacharya has a significant job back of him in the reform of NIH.
Do you like PJ Media’s conventional reporting on the woke media and the dramatic left? To keep bringing you the facts, please help our work. Use the discount code Duel to save 60 % off your VIP account when you sign up for PJ Media VIP!  ,
