Is Trump rewriting international laws to appeal to Putin? The” Unpredictable-irrational Donald” ( Representative AI image )
In his next name, does US President Donald Trump seem to be coordinating with Russian President Vladimir Putin, or is he just expressing a viewpoint that easily combines with the Kremlin’s? The former is suggested by a recent study from Bloomberg, which has sparked a flurry of debate about whether Trump’s policies and rhetoric are veering too far in the direction of Russia’s.
The Bloomberg research, which is titled” Trump Tells Americans What Putin Wants Them To Hear,” examines how Trump’s people statements and online content contrast with the Kremlin’s tale. Significant similarities in tone and message were found when the study used a huge vocabulary type to compare more than 3, 000 social media posts from the Trump administration to over 300 public comments made by Trump between August 2024 and mid-March 2025.
The results reveal that Trump’s criticism frequently aligns with positions that Moscow has publicly held, especially regarding Nato, Ukraine’s independence, and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s validity. Both Kyiv’s Nato ambitions and a recurring tale about the job of Ukrainian territory are both well-known Russian talking points.
Prof. Pushpesh Pant, a leading expert on global politics, disagreed with this research and claimed that Trump’s international plan may be reduced to a resemblance to Vladimir Putin.
Donald Trump is uncertain and foolish. In a conversation with the Times of India, Prof. Pant said,” Any attempt to view his foreign policy through comments or American media analysis is inevitably futile.
” He may only hold that position for as long as he needs to counter China,” he said,” no matter how much he wants to appear aligned with Putin.”
Pant continued,” I looked into his eye and I saw his consciousness,” as George W. Bush after reportedly said about his first meet with Putin. I had faith in him. Trump is not unique from that list because of how quickly some officials interpret Putin, as that statement has become a symptom of that situation.
Trump’s own notes also demonstrate this persuasive change. He reminisced a conversation with a foreign leader at a February rally when he said,” Well, sir, if we don’t pay and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?” You didn’t give, you’re criminal, I said,” You didn’t give.” ” No, I did not defend you,” the statement read. The statement, which attracted the disapproval of US allies, was seen as a direct challenge to Nato’s social defense agreements, a position that Russia has long sought to undermine.
Additionally, according to Bloomberg, there are considerably fewer mentions of Russian aggression or help for Ukraine in social media content from Trump administration officials, with respect to topics like immigration, inside strife, and trade. The statement concludes that” the verbal evidence suggests a basic reorientation of American foreign policy discourse under Trump’s leadership, one that is extremely consistent with how Soviet officials define global affairs.”
CNN’s parallel reporting paints a likewise nervous image. The network revealed that US brains authorities have warned lawmakers about continuing Russian intervention efforts to thwart Trump’s re-election and presently his administration. One Republican senator told CNN,” It’s never a pleasant place.” However, the situation is getting more difficult to ignore.
But, Prof. Pant offered a different viewpoint:” Trump’s perceived bend toward Putin by the international media also stems from continued allegations that Russia, under Putin’s management, planned cyber-attacks during Hillary Clinton’s strategy, possibly influencing her defeat.
Prof. Pant warned against sweeping opinions regarding Trump’s conflicting relationship with President Zelenskyy. It would be wrong to assume that Trump will prevail in the case of the Ukraine-Zelenskyy material offer. No fresh agreements with Zelenskyy will be made unless Trump settles before financial commitments, according to the agreement’s provisions. Additionally, the Russia-Ukraine conflict is still incredibly asymmetric and tilted in favor of Putin.
He continued,” One important aspect that deserves notice is that the final Ukraine-US material contract is less skewed in favor of the US and not as significant as earlier drafts.” It then permits a future American military engagement with Ukraine to be viewed as investment rather than as a demand for insurance for previous help.
Pant contends that Putin’s larger political image cannot be dissociated from his own traditional perspective. Putin sees himself as having a strong connection to Europe, particularly among Orthodox Christian communities, and does not consider Central Asian nations like Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, or Kazakhstan as carefully important. Ukraine, particularly Crimea and Kyiv, has historical and psychological impact for him. He won’t give in too quickly.
” Nation-ask-friendly places like Poland and Hungary will have reason to be deeply concerned if Putin succeeds in absorbing Ukraine,” Putin said. Poland could find itself under strong force as a Nato part, he warned, causing a” sea-change” that had unify Eastern Europe.
The controversy over whether Trump’s foreign policy is carefully calculated or intellectually reliant on Putin’s view is good to get worse as Trump prepares for a further consolidation of power in his second phrase in a gap with China.
However, it is still important to remember that social rationality and political alignment have never been more blurred.
