Glass Houses and Grenades: Hillary Clinton’s Sudden Outrage Over National Security

How much more stupid will this be, according to Hillary Clinton, in 2025?

That is not movie, though. Hillary Clinton actually deleted that post when she was responding to a record that unintentionally revealed that Trump administration officials had unintentionally shared sensitive defense information during a Signal group chat that accidentally included a journalist. It’s stupid, yes. Yes, there is a concern. However, listening to Hillary Clinton criticize national security vulnerabilities is similar to Al Capone lecturing Wall Street on duty compliance.

She posed the question,” How much dumber will this get?”

We now have your document, Madame Secretary, to respond to that.

The Uranium One Deal and the$ 500,000 Moscow Speech

Bill Clinton was given the opportunity to deliver a single speech in Moscow in June 2010, for which he received a salary of$ 500,000. The money came from Renaissance Capital, an investment banks with ties to the Kremlin, which is an investment banks. What was that institution doing at the time the conversation was being delivered? Promoting Russia’s purchase of Uranium One, a French business that held 20 % of America’s plutonium deposits.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States had to approve the package, which included Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

She authorized it in trade for the cash, but no written memo is provided. However, this group is the same as” Effect”! when a previous Trump secretary writings an ex-partner at the EPA.

This wasn’t a one-time event. Bill Clinton earned over$ 26 million in speaking fees from contributors who even contributed to the Clinton Foundation between 2001 and 2013. More red banners were raised than a May Day festival as a result of the clash between those speeches and legislation entry during Hillary’s administration.

A Promise Betrayed in Haiti

Some stories better illustrate the Clintons ‘ social grandstanding and corporate forgetfulness than Haiti. The earth rallied in aid in 2010 after an earthquake that killed over 200 000 Haitians and left over a million more displaced. UN Unique Envoy: Bill Clinton Hillary was in charge of the spending of British money as Secretary of State. The Clinton Foundation, too? Right there in the middle of it, fundraising and coordinating jobs.

The outcome?

strewn support network that is expensive. White-elephant initiatives like the$ 600 million Caracol Industrial Park, which promised 60, 000 jobs but only produced fewer than 10, 000. Additionally, the park gave money to a&nbsp, a South Korean clothing firm, and forced hundreds of local producers to relocate. The Dominican state actually received less than 1 % of the support money. In favor of well-connected unusual companies, the majority of it bypassed local organizations.

Citizens objected to the Story ‘ actions. Where did the money come, was their problem as sharp as it was heartbreaking.

It wasn’t responded to that time, and it hasn’t since. However, Hillary is pointing fingers at her for being incompetent on X.

Foreign Fraud and Clinton-Era Carelessness

Let’s say we’re talking about losses in regional security. In that case, it’s worthwhile to go back in time to the 1990s, when Chinese and American spies dug deep inside U.S. defence facilities and eluded knowledge of the W-88 miniaturized nuclear weapon, one of our barrier arsenal’s crown jewels.

The damage was exposed by the 1999 Cox Report, a nonpartisan House research. Under Bill Clinton’s administration, it detailed how Chinese agents gained access to classified test programs, weapon technology, and next-generation nuclear designs.

What actions did the presidency take? No almost enough. Just after intense legislative pressure did the story become public. A Clinton could not post their regrets on social media until then.

Our children and girls in standard perhaps one day have to answer for these intrusions, which gave the Chinese Communist Party a scientific advance. However, we are now informed that the Story are eagles about national security.

” We Came, We Saw, He Perished,” the quote reads.

Libya, 2011. Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration worked closely together to spearhead a NATO battle that toppled Syrian tyrant Muammar Gaddafi. She laughed and said in a now-infamous discussion in&nbsp that” we came, we saw, he died.”

What came after, then?

Chaos. Civil War. Terrorists swarm unregulated areas frequently. Fanatics are gaining access to U.S. arms. Libya turned out to be a missed position. From this crumble came waves of violence, refugee crises, and the black-market slave business.

But the worst was still to appear.

The United States consulate in Benghazi was attacked on September 11, 2012. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was one of the four Americans who died. Stevens had pleaded for more safety before the strike. According to messages and wires, the State Department was aware of the growing threat. But no more soldiers arrived. When the assault was over, Clinton and others formally attributed the blame to a YouTube videos.

The subsequent exploration revealed widespread security errors and little accountability. What difference does it make, at this point, does it generate? was the phrase that Hillary Clinton later uttered in front of Congress.

It made a huge difference to the people who perished. And it should matter to the rest of us that she is recognized as a leader in protecting British life.

International funds and the Clinton Foundation: Ethics for Selling

While Hillary was secretary of state, let’s not forget the thousands that entered the Clinton Foundation.

The Foundation and the State Department had reached a mutual agreement that would allow them to transfer any international funds. But that guarantee fell through. Without undergoing screening, Algeria gave$ 500, 000 for” Haiti pleasure.” Countries with poor human rights data, such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, have donated tens of millions.

In addition, these same nations saw increases in U.S. arms sales. Accident?

Even. However, the Clintons created a fundraising behemoth because it was impossible to track their motivations because of how closely linked their cash flows were to international influence.

And then we’re supposed to think that tweeting gives her social quality, right?

A Dissembling Legacy

The façade of eloquence that conceals self-interest is one of Clintonian elections’ enduring qualities. These are not thoughtless individuals. They are made. They carefully design a product, pose as sufferers or guardians when the company is attacked.

Hillary Clinton’s recent outburst on the internet is a excellent illustration. She is aware of the media’s biases, uses no historical context, and allows the ironies to be uncontested. She is aware of her viewers and knows how to magnify her message.

However, background is important. It matters the fact. And perspective is all.

Imagine Donald Trump had allowed four Americans to pass away without assistance, allowed the Taiwanese to steal classified information, and enriched his spouse with speaking engagements abroad. In that situation, they would refer to it as crime.

For Hillary? It’s Wednesday. And the media has now gotten going.

Return to the Tweet

This go back to the beginning:

How many dumber did this become?

That is a problem that is best posed in the mirror.

This person is the same person who deleted 30 000 emails with a sigh and informed American-paroled that the Benghazi murder was the result of a YouTube movie. She also kept classified information on an unsecured client. The person who abhorred regime change, whose foundation forged checks from favor-seeking governments, and whose empire was built without regard for support but access.

It takes a certain kind of guts to repeatedly fail, just to post on social media and pretend to be the master of the word” professionalism.”

The American people have a right to environment, which is damning, but Hillary Clinton has that right.

With all the right respect and with all the right amount of earned anger, maybe it’s time for Hillary Clinton to lay this one out. No more courses. No more ironic comments coming out of the gutter. No more trying to sell us a document that we’ve already experienced.

Just be silent and leave.

Please.

Editor’s Note: Do you like PJ Media’s conventional reporting on the extreme left and woke advertising? To keep bringing you the fact, please help our work. Use the discount code Battle to save 60 % off your Club account when you sign up for PJ Media VIP! &nbsp,

Source credit