Can I See a Wine List? Man Thinks He May Have Found the Site of the Wedding at Cana

A scientist may have found the wedding venue in Cana where Jesus performed his second mystery by turning water into wine. ( See John 2: 1-12 for the full account. ) In a report on Fox News, scholar Tom McCollough, who presided over Centre College’s history and religion classes, claims that Cana was based at the Jewish settlement of Khirbet Qana instead than Kafr Kanna, which is the location of some scholars. Fox reported:

According to McCollough,” We have discovered a huge Christian reverence cave complex that was used by Christian travelers who came to worship the water-to-wine miracle.” &nbsp,

This complex was used from the late second to the first sixth centuries and remained so until the 12th-century Crusaders.

McCollough likewise discovered a table with a marble vessel and an altar while conducting his excavation.

He noted that there was room for five more bottles, which is in line with the biblical account of the six rock bottles.

His group of excavators likewise discovered recommendations to Kyrie Iesou, a Koine Greek expression that means Lord Jesus, on the surfaces of the complex.

He said,” The pilgrim writings we have from this time that describe what travellers did and what they saw when they arrived in Cana of Galilee match very strongly what we have exposed as the reverence complex.”

McCollough even cited Josephus quotations to support his claim. &nbsp,

That’s all well and fine, but discovering a collection of vases ( the fancy name for the stone bottles that held wine, water, and oil ) is difficult. etc. ) does not always demonstrate biblical inerrancy with some supporting evidence. Amphorae and potsherds have been constantly discovered by scientists in the Holy Land. &nbsp,

Having said that, museums continues to support the historic significance of the Bible.

People have long argued that King David is a misconception. That is until a telegram was discovered that reveals a remarkable defense success over the House of David. As some say, Philistine postsherds have been discovered with the brand” Goliath” regardless of whether or not Goliath was a Nephilim. That was a well-known title in Philistine society, therefore. &nbsp,

It has been claimed that the Bible’s authors were ignorant goatherds. Data suggests that Abraham, or Abram, was one of the many people in the area at the time, a wealthy and powerful warrior, rather than just a strange horse rider. &nbsp,

Nehemiah, the Iranian king Artaxerxes I., was a meal taste for the time when he rebuilt Jerusalem after the captivity. Nehemiah would have had the backing of the king in that capacity. Given its place in the Ancient Near East, Jerusalem was regarded as a effectively significant area. Nehemiah approached the prince when the king wanted to go back to his country and rebuild, so it makes sense that the prince needed someone to take control of that area of his kingdom. &nbsp,

No bumpkins, the followers. Due to his dual roles as a man and business, Peter had to make decisions and pay taxes. That implies that he and anyone else who you believe wrote the Gospels had to be familiar with Greek, which is the speech of trade and state. Since Latin was the occupying force’s native tongue, Peter, the apostles, and yet Jesus were able to read, write, and speak Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, and perhaps a small amount of Latin. Yes, I am aware that Jesus was speak any language because of his holy character, but I am looking at this from a historical standpoint. According to some researchers, John’s family had strong political ties, which might have allowed him to get Jesus ‘ meetings with the Israeli church and gain information into the conversation between Jesus and Pilate. The Bible is full of poetry, sarcasm, tale, and analogies when it comes to speech. These issues were not limited to the 17th to the 21st centuries. If nothing else, to believe that the Bible’s writers were simpletons is bad scholarship. &nbsp,

Around Easter, it was fashionable to report that someone had discovered a tomb with the names” Jesus” or” Yeshua” on it, thereby allegedly refuting the Resurrection. Accomplishment was a pretty well-known name in the area, which is the issue with that claim. Finding a grave with the name Yeshua is similar to finding a tombstone with the brand” Mike” on it. It proves everything. There are also no shortage of fashionable accounts of Christ’s life, and not all of them are pleasant. One can’t really call the existence of a man a story, regardless of whether you think or not you think he was heavenly.

Unfortunately, my final semester of graduate college was a study of Genesis. I saved that category for the end, for some reason. When it came to writing the name paper, we had a wide range of subjects to choose from, including museums. One of my professors suggested that I investigate the work of Dr. Steven Collins. ” Discovering the City of Sodom” was a Collins ‘ book. He describes discovering a area south of the Jordan River at the Tall El-Hamman page. According to Collins, the ruins have important scorch marks and contain trinitite, which he claims was discovered. Trinite is also known as” Alamogordo Glass,” which was created when the area’s dust was exposed to the extremely hot storms during the Trinity nuclear bomb tests. What Collins has discovered is proof of a city that was the victim of a very strong thermal event that, assuming Collins ‘ research is on the up-and-up, has for centuries been affected by the environment around it. Even if one doesn’t believe that the hand of God caused the destruction, the history of Sodom and Gomorrah may well be based on a historic event, if Collins ‘ work proves otherwise.

Despite all the investigation and evidence, we lack beliefs. We may complain as much as we want about a design that lasts seven days. For that matter, we may reject the history of Utnapishtim and point to the boat-shaped sandstone formation in Turkey, which keeps appearing in the media. All the information in the world is worthless if all we are told is that we are wrong and that everyone else is wrong and that the reports in Genesis, Judges, First and Second Kings, Gospels, and the Epistles are bad. If we substitute the text for the Word’s essence, we have completely lost the purpose. &nbsp,

Source credit