The most recent and technological addition to OpenAI’s o-series lineup is the o3-pro, the most advanced and developed model. Previous iterations of this type family have consistently delivered impressive results in terms of normal AI benchmarks, particularly in mathematics, development, and academic tasks, and o3-pro builds on those strengths.
In part, the launch notes for OpenAI’s o3-pro stated that “o3-pro is a version of our most brilliant model, o3, designed to consider long and provide the most dependable responses. Users have favored this model since the release of o1-pro in areas like math, science, and coding, which are areas where o3-pro has continued to thrive, as evidenced by scientific evaluations.
Pro and Team ChatGPT users can now access the o3-pro concept through its API and ChatGPT, with Edu and Enterprise accounts expected to follow a similar implementation plan as earlier models.
Quantitative assessment
OpenAI gave mortal testers the chance to try out o3-pro and compare it to the results of o3 before publishing standard data. In crucial regions, the majority of these people testing preferred o3-pro over o3.
- All queries ( 64 % )
- Scientific analysis ( 64.9 % )
- Personal writing ( 66.7 % )
- Computer programming ( 62.7 % )
- Data analysis ( 64.3 % )
Benchmarks for pass@1 reliability and performance
A pass@1 standard, which is usually used to evaluate the effectiveness of contemporary AI models, highlights the model’s ability to deliver a precise response on the first try. Surprisingly, the o3-pro performs better than the o3 and o1-pro on a variety of measures.
| Competitive mathematics ( AIME 2024 ) | PhD-level science ( GPQA Diamond ) | Competitive coding ( Codeforces ) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| o3-pro | 93% | 84% | 2748 |
| o3 | 90% | 81% | 2517 |
| o1-pro | 86% | 79% | 1707 |
consistency measures for 4/4
The team at OpenAI subjected their AI models to a series of consistency measures for 4/4. In these evaluations, an AI model can only be successful if it provides a correct response in four out of four attempts. Any failed attempts result in an automatic failure of the consistency measures for 4/4.
| Competitive mathematics ( AIME 2024 ) | PhD-level science ( GPQA Diamond ) | Competitive coding ( Codeforces ) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| o3-pro | 90% | 76% | 2301 |
| o3 | 80% | 67% | 2011 |
| o1-pro | 80% | 74% | 1423 |
O3-pro’s restrictions
Among the things to think about with o3-pro are:
- While the OpenAI team fixes a technical issue, momentary conversations in o3-pro are now disabled at this time.
- O3-pro does no help graphic creation. Consumers are urged to employ GPT-4o, OpenAI o3, or OpenAI o4-mini for photo technology functionality.
- O3-pro does not help the Canvas software from OpenAI. If help may be added at a later time, it’s not known. >,
weighing the benefits and drawbacks of o3-pro
Although OpenAI acknowledges that in some situations, o3-pro functions slower than o1-pro, this is as a result of the more features in the most recent version. o3Pro isn’t your regular talk buddy; it’s the knucklehead you summon when accuracy comes before rate, according to TechnologyAdvice Managing Editor Corey Noles in his person guide on the TechRepublic sister site The Neuron.
O3-pro is the clear winner in terms of total features, with the ability to search the internet in real time, perform complex data study, give reasoning based on visual causes, and more.
Read our coverage of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s predictions for superintelligence.
