As the two nations together negotiate a business deal to reduce the worst of Trump’s taxes, President Donald Trump raised the price tag for Canada to be protected by his very anticipated Golden Dome missile defence job.
After decades of unrest due to Trump’s speech and economic pressure, Canada has the opportunity to “prove” itself to the United States, according to one expert. There are also social costs, such as a lack of clarity regarding the job.
When asked about Canada becoming the 51st position, he frequently suggested, Trump increased the cost from$ 61 billion, which he announced last month in a social media post.
Trump said,” They’re going to have to pay a lot of money for the dome.” They desire to be a part of it. By the way, we might strike a distinct agreement on that. We discussed it. They are going to give$ 71 billion, as they want. They will be inside the dome.
The number of the summit, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, spoke out about their debate regarding the Golden Dome in front of a representative from the Canadian Embassy in Washington.
Canada is considering how it might take part in or add value to the initiative, the director told the Washington Examiner.
Former Global Affairs Canada and Department of National Defense officials Vincent Rigby claimed it is “understood” that Canada cannot” move away” from the United States” completely” in terms of industry, finance, security, and security despite “diversification methods” because of Trump.  ,
We actually share a continent, Rigby, a teacher of public policy at McGill University, told the Washington Examiner. We are inseparable in that regard, so it makes sense for Canada to continue to cooperate with the US on defense and security concerns.
The North American Aerospace Defense Command, the only transnational military order in the world, is now made up of the United States and Canada. Despite NORAD providing missile warnings, nuclear missile protection is provided by the United States, with Canada investing$ 27 billion to modernize the system in 2022.
Before Canada decided against joining the U.S. ballistic missile defense system 20 years ago, Rigby recalls being a part of the negotiating team because it was concerned it might be “destabilizing in terms of punishment.”
According to Rigby, the elections between the United States, Canada, and the rest of the world have changed then, twenty-two years after.
Does it have any social repercussions? Gigby posed a question. ” Yes, for sure,” I suppose. If Canada may assist the United States, I believe that President Trump will find it advantageous, and that this will increase the Canada-U’s online gain. S. marriage, then that’s advantageous. That’s a certain addition, in my opinion.
You might think that many Canadians do accept the chance to demonstrate to the United States that we can become valuable, that we are a good neighbor, and that you don’t have to be picky with us. However, many Canadians may argue that “why did we then reach out and try to assist him in some way” given how unfairly treated we have been by President Trump?
Before last year’s election, Trump first suggested the Golden Dome, which was inspired by former president Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative, and later announced that U.S. Space Force General Michael Guetlein would take the lead on the task, which is expected to cost$ 175 billion and take three years to develop. The House made up$ 25 billion in its iteration of the “one big, beautiful bill,” according to the Congressional Budget Office, which was anticipated to be closer to$ 542 billion. Researchers have also emphasized that the space-based and fast solutions are still in the long-term growth stage.
According to Todd Harrison, a senior fellow for the American Enterprise Institute of Defense, those space-based interceptors might grant Canada “pause” because they might encourage a area arms race between the United States, China, and Russia.
The biggest question is whether Trump will receive a victory like this or whether they will receive any compensation, Harrison told the Washington Examiner.
Imran Bayoumi, a double U.S. citizen, and Atlantic Council GeoStrategy Initiative Associate Director, acknowledged that there is a social component given that Canada is” trying to lose its reputation as a freeloader” in terms of NATO defence investing.
There are questions within Canada about whether the Carney state may defeat its long-standing domestic opposition to nuclear weapon protection, according to Bayoumi, who told the Washington Examiner.  ,
Without greater clarity on what exactly the Golden Dome will entail, Carney may have a hard time convincing Canadians to back it, the former Department of Defense aide continued,” There is also a lack of detail on what exactly the Golden Dome will entail…
Christopher Hernandez-Roy, Deputy Director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies Americas Program, said that Carney promised to change the country’s defense spending during his visit to the White House last month,” an irritant in the bilateral relationship going back several administrations of both parties.”
Hernandez-Roy told the Washington Examiner,” He realizes that Canada can no longer be a laggard on defense, and that this issue is also closely related to the broader U.S. Canada trade relationship and tariffs.” He therefore pledged to meet the NATO 2 % standard by the following year ahead of the G7 meeting. He also made a pledge to increase Canada’s Arctic defenses, and he is aware that it needs to bear more costs for continental defense.
Hernandez-Roy emphasized how Canada’s “openness” to the Golden Dome is” a notable change” from its “historical reluctance” regarding ballistic missile defense, like Rigby and Bayoumi did.
” I think they need to decide right now how to participate in a way that makes sense to Canada, including their role in shaping how the system will function eventually,” he said. These costs would likely be a part of meeting and eventually exceeding the current NATO 2 % threshold, which will almost certainly rise to 3 % or more at the upcoming NATO summit.
After speaking with Trump at the G7 summit, Carney stated to reporters that both he and Trump were “focused on pressing issues relating to global issues, as well as immediate trade pressures, as well as the need to establish a new economic and security relationship between Canada and the United States. S”.
We agreed to continue discussions over a deal in the upcoming thirty days, Carney said on social media.
TRUMP GOLDEN DOME COULD” TURN” OUTER SPACE INTO A BATTLEFIELD, CHINA WARNS
Trump made a point of praising Carney for being the summit’s host before he left, but he warned the prime minister against becoming” too complex on the deals”.
He told reporters,” They never get done, and we need speed.”
