Despite criticism from teachers ‘ unions, a federal prosecutor supports the separation of powers.
In response to a lawsuit brought by the American Association of University Professors, which sought to undermine the senior tree, a federal judge on Monday upheld the separation of powers.
The Trump presidency canceled federal funding to Columbia University because of hatred fears, the AAUP and the American Federation of Teachers sued. A left-wing organization called” Protect Democracy” represented the teachers ‘ unions.
However, the university organizations may go back to school and study the separation of powers and the executive branch, as Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil lacked a session on “our democracy.”
The defendants requested a preliminary injunction against Columbia’s funding cuts, saying that they are not directly harmed by the choice.
No school, of course, has a legal right to receive federal funding from the taxpayer. Additionally, as Judge Vyskocil pointed out, the organisations cannot demonstrate that they are instantly harmed. In his first term, President Trump supported her nomination to the Southern District of New York provincial judge with the support of Democratic New York Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Chuck Schumer.
Judge Vyskocil wrote:
Attorneys for an organization called” Protec Democracy” insist that a district court judge may soon get the Executive Branch to restore the flow of taxpayer money to an elite college, whose funding the accused represent is incompatible with the objectives of the duly elected President of the United States. If personal judges grant amazing relief to each plaintiff who clamors for executive action, our democracy cannot function.
She made it clear that the plaintiffs have never received the provides directly from the federal government. She points out that Columbia has the right to file a complaint, but they are not a party to this one.
By putting a “gun to the head” of non-party Columbia University, the judge also ripped into the AAUP and the AFT for their” sensational rhetoric about the transcendent value” of academic freedom and the Trump administration’s “effort to control the thought’ of faculty and students” ( even though Plaintiffs do not purport to represent any students ).
Additionally, the judge noted that Columbia and the Trump administration are negotiating hatred on campus. The AAUP is “inserting themselves into a dispute,” the group claims.
President Trump has attempted to re-use common in the transmission of hundreds of billions of tax dollars since taking business. Additionally, he is taking what he believes to be the best course of action to shield Jewish students from racist abuse on campus.
It is appropriate for the federal government to use the resources available to influence change, despite opposition to professors ‘ claims that provides shouldn’t be used for school activities that aren’t related to school activities.
Luckily, this judge defended “our democracy” in the face of threats from university unions to stifle Trump and his authority through the executive branch and compel Columbia to change to guard all students.
MORE: A student in her 10th year of gender studies fears that Trump did arrest her before she graduates in 2026.
Donald Trump grunts, White House/X, and IMAGE CAPTION AND CREDIT
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Instagram.
