Between the start of 2021 and the close of 2023, law enforcement recovered more than 1, 100 modified Glock guns, according to the lawsuit.
The city of Chicago is suing Glock, alleging that the firearm manufacturer should be held accountable for gun crime because its products are so simple to convert into automatic weapons.
Between the start of 2021 and the close of 2023, according to the lawsuit, law enforcement in the Chicago area recovered more than 1,100 modified Glock guns.
Chicago is represented in the petition by Everytown Law, the prosecution arm of the gun-control lobbying group Everytown for Gun Safety.
Federal law strictly regulates automated arms. The 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act ended the machine gun registration, making it mandatory for all automated weapons that are currently owned by citizens.
A valid user may be willing to sell an automatic weapon that has been registered before the 1986 legislation.
Related Reports
Buyers must be fingerprinted, apply for a move, and give a specific tax to take possession. In contrast, the government is more likely to have access to semi-automatic weapons like the Glock line of pistols.
Technically, someone could pick up a semi-automatic Glock handgun and use an automatic sear device to make it a fully automatic weapon. Glock does n’t sell it as an aftermarket component.
The gun manufacturer may have taken steps to modify its models to prevent these possible illegal changes, the lawsuit claims in the Chicago complaint.
According to the lawsuit, Chinese retailers sell auto-sear devices for as little as$ 20 and falsely advertise them as “other household or recreational products.” According to the fit, the devices can be produced cheaply using a 3D printer and website with online specifications.
According to the problem, a” Glock switch” may become attached to the back of the roll on a Glock pistol. By allowing the striker to proceed firing as the slip reciprocates with recoil, it achieves quick fire by keeping the interior trigger bar over.
According to the lawsuit, these items can be attached to a wrench in as little as five minutes with common equipment like a hammer. They are more difficult to fit on another guns, the coat notes.
The complaint asserts that Glock has been aware of these auto-sear products for years.
Glock made the firm decision to continue profiting from the sale of its easily customizable guns to the human market, the complaint claims.
” The result endangers the health and safety of Chicagoans and raises and exacerbates the injury and death from gun violence—draining the City’s people health, safety, investigative, and judicial tools and causing some City people to fear using public roads, parks, schools, and travel”.
The petition was described by the city of Chicago as a” first of its kind” effort to stop Glock from selling items in the Chicago market that are too simple to change into automatic weapons. Additionally, the lawsuit asks for damages, curse payments, and disgorgement of profits made from alleged unlawful do.
NTD News reached out to Glock for opinion on the petition, but it was too late to press time to respond.
Modifications” Won’t Be Ample”
According to the Chicago lawsuit, a” Glock Switch” device can be installed on the first four Glock pistol generations ( Gens1 through 4 ) by simply using a screwdriver to remove the pistol’s slide’s backplate and place the auto-sear device.
A polymer notch on the pistol frame that was introduced in the fifth generation of Glock pistols ( Gen5 ) would need to be filed down before a” Glock s witch” device could be installed.
The lawsuit contends that this style change “presents no real problem or deterrent to thieves seeking to change their Glocks” and that it would still only taking moments, with tutorials readily available online.
The comments about Gen5 Glock products made by the California Rifle & Pistol Association, according to Kostas Moros, an attorney who regularly makes comments on firearms-related litigation.
Additionally, Mr. Moros claimed that the lawsuit would make it harder for Glock to market products in other states, such as California, where new handguns must first be added to a list of approved products before they can be sold.
It’s hilarious how they complain that Everytown supports the Handgun Roster, which makes it impossible for them to sell the older models, while at least a portion of the reason they do that is to serve the California market. Mr. Moros wrote.
