<,? http compression =”UTF- 8″???????? >,
A bill that would give local and state law enforcement the authority to make arrests for people suspected of entering the country illegally will be taken up by Louisiana legislators immediately.
Senate Bill 388 resembles a contentious Texas law that is up for debate and is up for substantial legal challenges from the Biden administration and civil rights organizations, who claim that it unlawfully usurps the federal government’s authority to enforce immigration laws and may cause panic at the country’s southern border.
The Louisiana costs, filed last week by Sen. Valarie Hodges, R- Denham Springs, is scheduled for a reading Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary C commission. Yet if S. B. Although 388 passes the government and is signed into law, how it will be decided by the courts regarding Senate Bill 4 and the Texas law’s fate will ultimately depend on how the judges decide to interpret it.
That statute has been the focus of a conflict between Texas governor and governor. Greg Abbott and the Biden presidency debate whether states have the authority to develop an individual immigration legislation. Next Tuesday, after months of backwards- and- forth in the national courts, the U. S. Supreme Court recently allowed the Texas law to take impact before it was blocked by judges at the U. S. 5th Circuit , Court of Appeals in New Orleans. A landmark Supreme Court decision was overturn long-held legal precedent that favored federal immigration control over that of the state.
Similar legislation is being considered by several other Republican-controlled states this year, including Kansas and Oklahoma, with Iowa lawmakers passing a bill last week that was superior to that in other states.
The Louisiana bill would increase the power of state and local law enforcement in what is currently the case with federal immigration and customs police officials, similar to the Texas law. It would include “unlawful access or immoral reentry by an mysterious” as a category of state crimes in Louisiana, with a one-year prison sentence for first-time offenses and two years for second-time offenses.
The proposed bill would also make an interstate small with various states, especially Texas, to maintain border security. A decision in the Texas situation will affect the act. If passed, it would serve as a trigger laws and take effect right away in the event that a court decision favors the Lone Star State.
Hodges, who has been anticipating the federal government’s “take action” on the frontier, said she has been working on the bill since November. During the Biden administration, the number of people who crossed the U.S. southern border from Mexico reached record highs, but those numbers significantly decreased from December 2023 to January 2024.
” We are being invaded and we’ve learned that many of those entering our nation are known terrorists, scammers, individual criminals and drug gang people”, Hodges said in an emailed statement to Verite News.
Research have shown that illegal individuals have lower crime rates than citizens of the United States.
The bill’s critics claim that it overreaches express power in an illegal way.
The legislation, according to staff attorney Huey Fischer Garca of the Southern Poverty Law Center, may require state judges to behave similarly to immigration judges and local police officers to behave similarly to ICE officers.
” It’s going to make a delay in our courts, it’s going to dump state assets, and it’s not going to really reduce violence or make Louisiana any safer”, Fischer GarcÃa said.
A” surreal energy get”
The act comes as Gov. Jeff Landry, in his first months in office, has begun to implement his radical position on emigration. Landry ordered state companies to obtain and post information on refugees living in Louisiana one week after taking up his new position in January. Landry made an appearance at the southern boundary of Texas in February alongside Abbott and other Democratic governors to claim that the Biden administration “has totally abandoned its duty” to uphold immigration law. Additionally, he sent 150 Louisiana National Guard soldiers to South Texas ‘ frontier.
Landry’s company did not respond to comments on this story’s details.
The Louisiana costs may not grant condition officers the authority to deport people, contrary to the Texas law. Additionally, the Texas law imposes harsher penalties for duplicate offenses, including up to 20 years in prison, for unlawful entry and re-entry. However, the Louisiana act had house Louisiana in an interstate agreement with Texas and other states that would be willing to take part in Texas ‘ state-led border security initiatives.
Members of this small may reveal law enforcement details with each other and give them state resources to create natural barriers and surveillance systems to stop illegal action along the border, according to the Louisiana bill.
According to Hodges, who has a history of supporting anti-immigration plan and whose promotion site credits her with leading a duel in 2016 that “put an end to shelter cities in Louisiana,” the Constitution allows states to enter into these particles in the case of an invasion.
” We have a right to defend our nation”, Hodges said in a statement.
Immigration rights attorneys contend that S. B. The federal immigration code’s technical standards are broken by the poorly written bill 388. According to Sarah Rich, an attorney for the SPLC’s Immigrant Justice Litigation Team, the bill’s broad language could even lead to foreign visitors visiting New Orleans for Mardi Gras.
” Every word in the immigration code means something specific, and here they’re just throwing words around”, Rich said.
The Louisiana bill could lead law enforcement to racially profile individuals as well, Rich said:  ,” You’re asking local sheriff’s deputies, local cops, to try to figure out who is here unlawfully. …Of course, there are concerns about racial profiling due to how race is associated with immigration status.
Another immigration bill in this year’s session, sponsored by Sen. Blake Miguez, R- New Iberia, would override any local, so- called sanctuary policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. In addition, Miguel’s bill would veto the governor’s decision to withhold state funding from local governments in the case of such policies. That bill, which passed out of committee, is awaiting a vote in the Senate.
Attorneys for the SPLC think that the bill is intended to attack New Orleans ‘ local immigration practices. Since 2013, the Orleans Parish Sheriff’s Office has been requesting ICE detainers, which is a common practice in sanctuary cities.
” It’s a tremendous power grab for a governor who has been incredibly hostile to both immigrants and New Orleans as a whole,” Fischer Garca said.
This article first appeared on Verite News, and it is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
