Cheaper game subscriptions. More payment options. App Store developers have greater flexibility. More customer option.
If the U.S. Department of Justice successfully defends its long-awaited antitrust lawsuit against the Cupertino, California software giant, those are some of the options that customer proponents hope may arise for users of Apple smartphones, tablets, and other products.
Apple is accused of stifling opposition and leveraging its dominance of the common App Store to raise customer costs, according to the lawsuit, which was filed on Thursday. If the Court prevails in its case, significant changes could be made to Apple’s business, probably altering how much the company charges app developers and customers for goods and services.
Consumer Watchdog’s leader, Jamie Court, said,” The Department of Justice is generally checking Apple’s use of its industry power to make sure it’s not an abuse of its business power.”
The Apple App Store has accounted for 30 % of all profit for years from in-app payments made by third-party designers or software membership. Developers have claimed that this split makes it difficult to maintain their businesses, but they pass that burden on to customers.
Unlike Google’s Android operating system, which runs on Google devices as well as other products such as Samsung’s, Apple goods operate solely through its own technology, iOS. The only way for independent programmers to publish their apps on the Apple App Store is by adhering to the rules set by the phone manufacturer. If they do n’t, they risk losing out on millions of customers.
According to Court,” This indicates that Apple will have to lower the costs associated with other software.” It will need to open its payment methods to various companies, and it will need to make sure that users of other devices have essentially the same access to comfort and support.
Some firms, including Scandinavian sound organization Spotify, have directed people to listen via their platforms, avoiding the up to 30 % cut. In 2020, Epic Games , sued Apple , after it got kicked out of the App Store when its match” Fortnite” was attempting to avoid Apple’s demand on in- software purchases. A U. S. District Court judge , ruled , in that case that Apple did n’t maintain a monopoly in the market for mobile games, but ordered the company to allow developers to alert customers to different payment options.
Some experts anticipate that the president’s actions will cause Apple to make some changes in its procedures, but they do not anticipate any significant changes to come about right away. The most probable result is a lawsuit.
We do not anticipate any changes to the business unit right now, but Apple will need to figure out a way to resolve this dispute later, spend a significant fine, and inevitably find some bargain with developers regarding the future of the App Store structure, according to Daniel Ives, a managing director at Wedbush Securities, in a note to clients.
The Department of Justice lawsuit” threatens who we are and the principles that set Apple products apart in fiercely competitive markets,” according to Apple in a statement. Apple has long argued that its customers benefit from its business model, which entails a tightly controlled ecosystem of software and hardware.
” If successful, it would hinder our ability to create the kind of technology people expect from Apple — where hardware, software, and services intersect”, Apple said. ” It would also set a dangerous precedent, empowering government to take a heavy hand in designing people’s technology”.
The business has praised the developer community’s economic success from the App Store. According to Analysis Group, Apple’s App Store ecosystem generated$ 1.1 trillion in developer billings and sales in 2022. Without any compensation to Apple, according to Apple, over 90 % of sales and billings were made by developers and businesses.
” As this]Analysis Group ] report shows, the App Store is a vibrant, innovative marketplace where opportunity thrives, and we’re as committed as ever to investing in developers ‘ success and the app economy’s future”, Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook said in a , statement , in May.
However, some analysts believe that Apple’s rivals still offer a level of security and customer protection while making lower profits, which should cause the company to be less constrained.
According to Rob Enderle, principal analyst with advisory services firm Enderle Group,” Apple’s margins are much larger than the rest of the industry, and this makes them a target for this.” A company’s “excessive margin” raises the possibility of a monopoly power abuse.
Apple violates its role as the App Store’s gatekeeper, releasing products that directly compete with rivals and disadvantage them.
For example, Apple released its own streaming music service, Apple Music, which competes directly with Spotify. Apple rivals claim that the company has a competitive advantage because it also controls the software system and App Store in addition to owning the iPhone. Additionally, Apple has complete control over which apps are already installed on its iPhones.
AliveCor, a law firm that represented Mountain View, California-based AliveCor when it sued Apple in 2021 over related concerns, “it’s finally bringing to light a lot of the practices that Apple engages in that those within the industry frequently do n’t have the ability to complain about.”
AliveCor’s lawsuit, which accused Apple of wielding monopoly power through Apple Watch apps, was recently dismissed, but the company said it plans to appeal. Apple said that the judge’s ruling” confirms that it is not anticompetitive” in , a statement , released to Reuters.
According to Wolfson, a partner at Quinn Emanuel,” Apple is not the best at everything, and there are numerous examples of apps out there where Apple has had it pushed or made its own version, and it’s not as high quality as what third parties have developed.” ” By ( Apple ) constantly putting itself at the forefront, it’s often making it so that consumers do n’t have a choice of the best option”.
According to other industry experts, the Department of Justice lawsuit may also result in better usability across various Apple apps or services. For example, by making it less awkward when Apple users text with Android customers.
Ives warned that the “green text chains with the one non-Apple friend may be coming to an end.”
Many analysts see similarities between the Department of Justice’s lawsuit and settlement with Microsoft over antitrust practices in 2002, which gave computer manufacturers more freedom to install other web browsers on their computers that were n’t produced by Microsoft.
” It set the tone for the whole internet age”, Court said. ” We would never have the proliferation of companies that created innovative products if Microsoft had been allowed to dominate that market,” said one analyst. There would n’t be Google if Microsoft had to make everyone who had a Windows operating system use their browser.
___
© 2024 Los Angeles Times
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
