Three whistleblowers claimed that the Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) failed to look into their claim that institutional mortgage lenders did not follow regulations, but the Supreme Court decided not to review the dismissal of the case.
The world’s highest judge refused to grant the petition for appellate, or assessment, in Stone v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in an anonymous purchase on April 1. No judges dissented. The judge did not explain its choice. The judges had discussed the plea at their secret meeting on March 28. At least four of the nine judges may vote in order for a petition to be moved to the dental discussion level.
Trending
- ‘New form of commitment’: Ukraine, US sign minerals deal after two-month delay
- Truckers weigh having to pass English test to drive in US
- Trump appeals for ‘time’ as he upends the global economy
- California judge’s ruling on warrantless migrant arrests sows confusion
- Bangladesh HC grants bail to Hindu monk; government seeks stay
- Temperature in Britain could set records this week
- Young people are not as happy as they used to be, finds recent surveys
- Good Intentions: Bad Results