A well-known Princeton University traditional professor who attended a school eating club earlier this trimester sparked the development of a new plan that requires guests to become pre-approved to give those who might be offended by their presence notification of their arrival.
The elite Ivy League campus ‘ eating clubs are similar to co-ed fraternities where people socialize and take on the campus. In February, the doctor, Robert George, joined scholar Matthew Wilson for breakfast at the Charter Club.
Shortly after, Charter members were notified that to keep an “inclusive surroundings” and a” shelter” for people, customers who are not family members or friends would not be permitted to enter the pub during food service time without prior approval from its officials, Wilson reported in the Daily Princetonian.
Wilson continued:
Friends and I discovered shortly after the announcement that the plan had been created in response to undergraduate complaints about my Feb. 14 breakfast with my doctor. After seeking out the club director, I learned more: A “group of account” — whose identities and accurate numbers were unknown — felt” caught off guard” when they saw my professor in Charter, and they were greatly upset by his presence. In the future, at least, they wanted” the right to not be in that place” at the same time as him. After receiving their problem, the league acceded to their needs.
After I began making copies of a complaint to the club’s students board asking for them to repeal the plan, Johns wrote a note to club members stating that” Charter is an inclusive private club that will never reject a member’s request to send a visitor to our shelter.” The bulk of the policy, which required prior approval and the issuance of an advanced warning to all club members, was still intact, despite her new announcement. Even if the club’s leadership permitted my professor to join the club at a specific time and place, the mandatory warning is ridiculous.
The eating clubs must avoid turning into ideological echo chambers or” safe spaces” where people go to avoid having their convictions or worldview challenged, just like the University as a whole. Unfortunately, Charter’s new visitors policy, which was put in place to protect students from those whose ideas and mere existence they falsely and ridiculously believe threaten their safety, does exactly the opposite. The new policy must be immediately withdrawn because it is intellectually irrefutable.
A student Democrat leader at Princeton said he would exclude conservative students from a prestigious eating club because they are “bigots” who “make trans people feel uncomfortable” just a few months prior to this incident.
Wilson noted in the Daily that only seven years ago the Charter Club used Professor George as a fundraising tool in an ironic twist. Wilson, an alumnus fellow with The College Fix, said via email he is “planning to test the policy”.
George, on the other hand, questioned the new policy on X:” So students have to give notice to bring me as a guest for lunch at a club that I myself belong to? And, as a member, am entitled to use whenever I like, and bring guests of my own”?
MORE: Princeton College Dem leader: Do n’t allow conservatives in eating club
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
