One of Mr. Bobulinski’s libel says is that the New York congressman’s lawsuit is just one.
Tony Bobulinski, a previous Biden home business connect and see in an ongoing Democrat- led senate investigation, has filed a lawsuit against Rep. Dan Goldman ( D- N. Y. ) accusing the senator of slander.
Mr. Bobulinski collaborated with Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, on a business venture involving China Energy Company Limited, a Chinese energy company. Despite the elder Biden’s numerous public assertions to the contrary, he alleges that the elder Biden was aware of his son’s foreign business dealings and even had personally benefited from those dealings. House Republicans are pursuing an impeachment investigation into whether President Biden had used influence to influence the conduct of his family’s business dealings, according to Mr. Bobulinski.
The lawsuit claims that Mr. Goldman made the controversial allegations about Mr. Bobulinski, discrediting him and the impeachment investigation. The lawyer for Mr. Bobulinski contends that the lawmaker’s statements constitute defamation in their own right because they falsely allege Mr. Bobulinski lied to Congress and defame implication that Mr. Trump has paid for Mr. Bobulinski to bring allegations about the Biden family to Congress.
Related Stories
According to Mr. Bobulinski’s lawsuit, he claims that he has experienced mental agony and has suffered reputational harm that has had an impact on his business endeavors and professional work as a result of Mr. Goldman’s claims. He is seeking an award of compensatory, special, and punitive damages totaling$ 20 million.
NTD News reached out to Mr. Goldman about the lawsuit, but it was too late to publish a response.
Bobulinski Goes on Legal Offense
One of Mr. Bobulinski’s libel says is that the New York congressman’s lawsuit is just one.
Mr. Bobulinski has denied claims that Mr. Meadows had handed him anything during the 2020 encounter and argued Ms. Hutchinson’s claims were meant to cast” an innocuous interaction” between the two men as an illicit, immoral, or even illegal encounter.
In a follow-up on March 21, Ms. Tarlov altered her original claim.
” During an exchange with my colleagues about the hearing, I said that Mr. Bobulinski’s lawyers ‘ fees have been paid by a Trump super PAC as recently as January. She began by stating that the lawyer representing Mr. Bobulinski was paid by a Trump PAC. He denies that Mr. Bobulinski’s legal fees were paid in any way, saying,” I have no evidence that they were.”
Mr. Bobulinski’s lawsuit argues Ms. Tarlov’s March 21 clarification was “half- hearted, incomplete,  , and unacceptable” and called on her to issue a more clear- cut apology but that she refused.
