Alan Dershowitz, a withdrew Harvard Law professor, offered his opinion on the matter.
After the prosecutor  filed court documents last week that important of a Florida prosecutor in the classified records event, retired Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz suggested that Trump special counsel Jack Smith is” trying to rush” the prosecution and trying to “provoke the judge.”
The Presidential Records Act’s earlier provisional order, according to Mr. Smith’s team, was challenged in a court filing earlier in April, saying it does n’t apply in this case. Afterwards, she rejected former President Donald Trump’s lawyers ‘ try to have the situation dismissed under the work, but she also rebuked Mr. Smith’s voice.
But Mr. Dershowitz, a former high- profile criminal defense lawyer, said in a recent interview that Mr. Smith is “terrified” about a” fair trial in Florida” because he’s” not going to have a fair trial in Washington D. C.]where] 95 percent of the voters hate Donald Trump, he knows there’s not going to be a fair trial in Georgia, ]and ] certainly not in New York”. He made reference to the three distinct criminal cases in which President Trump is facing fees.
According to Mr. Dershowitz, who has been largely critical of the indictments against President Trump, the latest filings by the Smith group may be an effort to “provoke the determine” in Florida into issuing a rushed buy that prosecutors is charm.
” The Trump persons are being accused of trying to postpone the trial”, Mr. Dershowitz said. ” That’s nonsense, it’s the prosecution that’s trying to rush the trial. According to Jack Smith, the American people are entitled to a criminal conviction before choosing who to cast ballot for. That’s… really an entrance of election intervention”.
Related Tales
According to Mr. Smith’s team, the prosecution’s release came after an exceptionally important document was filed in the case, claiming that when he caused boxes to be moved to Mar-a-Lago, he believed that his removal of records constituted a personal designation under the Presidential Records Act.
” To the contrary, every witness who was asked this question had not heard for a thing”, they added. President Trump has said on social media that he had the power, as president, to disclose records for his own private property.
The former president’s team has argued that the Presidential Records Act allows him to identify classified documents as his own home, which they claim renders the president’s charges against him as moot.
Judge Cannon refuted the ex-president’s claims that the law allows him to keep the records after he leaves the White House on April 4.
Another Researchers weigh in.
However, a former federal attorney who writes for MSNBC claimed that President Trump might benefit from the most recent Cannon purchase.
He interpreted Judge Cannon’s decision to say that she will wait until a judge is sworn in to determine whether the previous leader had the right to hold the classified papers under the Presidential Records Act. If that happens, he said Mr. Smith will not be able to appeal her ruling.
Judge Cannon’s ruling on “how the jury must find Donald Trump not guilty” was addressed by the jury. And guess what, Jack? You ca n’t appeal it at that point. Game over,'” he said in a recent YouTube interview. The order, he claimed, is “extremely ominous” for prosecutors in the case.
In a report released on April 5, former federal prosecutor David Weinstein told Politico that while I am not a conspiracy theorist, I do n’t want to claim that this is being done to intentionally delaying the progress of the case, but that it seems the opposite.
Although the documents case was originally scheduled for trial on May 20, Judge Cannon heard arguments on a different date without having one set up right away. Although defense attorneys have also stated that President Trump should n’t be forced to appear in court while the election is pending, both sides have said they could be ready for trial this summer.
This report was written by The Associated Press.
