When asked why the term “folks” is spelled “f-o-l-x” in a book that also contains websites upon pages of “woke” diction and explanations used in Columbia School of Social Work courses, Columbia University President Nemat “Minouche” Shafik questioned the education of faculty at the Ivy League establishment on Wednesday.
When Rep. Shafik testified before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, which is looking into hatred in British universities, Shafik was speaking. Jim Banks, R-Ind, pressed her on the writing.
“ I did n’t go to an Ivy League school, admittedly. Can you explain why the University of Social Work’s School of Social Work uses the word “folks” in this book and elsewhere? ” Lenders asked. “ What does that imply? ”
“They don’t know how to spell? ” Shafik suggested. “ I mean, I’m not familiar with that writing. ”
“ I don’t find it a laughing matter, ” Banks said.
“I’m not laughing either, ” Shafik replied. “ I think it ’s — I really don’t—”
“You’re denying that this is a standard item of the institution, ” Banks said. You are conscious, however, that this is distributed to all of your kids, and you are not attempting to stop it. ”
“As I said, it ’s not an official product of the administration, ” Shafik said.
Is this how the term ‘folks’ is spelled by Columbia University? ” Businesses clarified.
“No, ” Shafik said.
The term “folx ” spelled with an “x ” rather than a “ks, ” is far-left language manipulation to “explicitly signal the inclusion of groups commonly marginalized, ” according to Merriam-Webster. In other words, it takes a syllable with a preset meaning and affects it to signal loyalty to the left’s “diversity, equity, and inclusion ” model.
Businesses also asked Shafik to determine “Ashkenormativity, ” another crazy phrase in the book.
“I’m not familiar with that phrase, ” Shafik said. “ I believe it appeared in a student vocabulary. ”
You ca n’t define it for us, but it appears in the orientation guidebook that is given to all of the students at the School of Social Work. ” Businesses pressed. “You seem to be common. ”
“ I don’t use that phrase. I don’t recognize that name, ” Shafik said. “ I don’t think it ’s a product of the School of Social Work. ”
Banks read the definition of “Ashkenormativity ” from the handbook, which said its “a system of oppression that favors white Jewish ‘folx, ’ based on the assumption that all Jewish ‘folx ’ are Ashkenazi, or from Western Europe. ”
“Is that correct? ” Lenders added.
“ I don’t agree with it. The university president attempted to distance herself from the materials distributed to Columbia students under her leadership, but she said,” I do n’t think it’s very useful.”
Following a group of another prestigious university presidents who refused to vehemently denounce antisemitism during a congressional hearing in December, Shafik’s testimony comes in the wake of this. Two of the three who had appeared on Capitol Hill were ousted due to their shocking messages and public outcry. The hearing, which featured presidents from Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ( MIT ), was held just two months after the Oct. 7 assault on Israel, when some 1,300 were slaughtered by the Egyptian criminal proxy party Hamas. Terrorist supporters expressed cooperation with Hamas as Israel began to respond to the problems, and antisemites on university campuses in certain started calling for the Holocaust.
The four Columbia University officials who made an appearance before politicians this year sought to avoid the same achievement after the three leaders created controversy at the December reading.
“Does calling for the murder of Jews violate Columbia’s code of conduct? ” asked Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, D-Ore.
Each of the four members from the university, including Shafik, said, “Yes, it does. ”
Additionally, Shafik emphasized that school officials have taken “more administrative actions than have probably been taken in the last decade at Columbia ” since the terrorist attack in October. ”
On the same day of the House hearing, racist protests erupted on the university’s Manhattan school.
