Military researchers believe Congress wants to engage in the defense ’s carried away woke agenda “before it ’s too soon. ” Captain Thomas Wheatley, an associate professor at the U. S. Military Academy at West Point, told the Daily Caller News Foundation the government could get to fully punish support people for refusing to use another company member’s preferred pronouns under existing plan.
The military “is straight to want to protect the rights and welfare of its trans service people. But it owes the same security to those who share a unique perspective on the issue, especially when that view is a deep-seated expression of individual morality, ” Wheatley told the DCNF.
None of the military ’s rules explicitly prohibit so-called “misgendering, ” when someone uses pronouns to identify a transgender people which do not relate to the person’s fresh female personality, Wheatley explained. However, existing guidance implies that using pronouns rejected by another person violates Military Equal Opportunity ( MEO ) regulations against sex-based harassment and discrimination.
The DCNF accounts:
A 2020 Equal Opportunity rules opened the door for leaders to content someone who refuses to recognize a trans servicemember’s so-called sex identity to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for expenses related to abuse, Capt. Thomas Wheatley, an associate professor at the U. S. Military Academy at West Point, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Such a move may possibly infringe on a servicemember’s legal right to defend their conscience, but it might not stop officials from employing more subtle methods of disciplining company members.
Service people could possibly be court-martialed for “refusing to use another person’s self-identified nouns, yet when their rejection stems from principled religious faith, ” Wheatley told the DCNF. “This law applies to service people at all times and in all areas, actually when they’re off work and in the protection of their off-post house. ”
The UCMJ even prohibits “conduct unbecoming of an official ” under Article 133 and action that could be seen to undermine the defense establishment under Article 134 — the same content the military uses to prosecute child usage and other acts of sexual deviation, he explained.
“Is it now ‘unbecoming ’ and incompatible with service as a commissioned officer to openly hold sincere religious convictions surrounding the act of creation and the nature of human sex? ” Wheatley asked.
Wheatley said his interest in the issue was sparked four years ago, when the Army updated its MEO policy stating “violations of MEO and Harassment Prevention and Response policies may result in disciplinary action under the UCMJ. ”
This Lieutenant Colonel is in charge of acquisitions for the U. S. Space Force.
Lt. Col. Bree Fram is in charge of developing, designing and acquiring space craft.
“ I have people staring at me and basically asking, ‘Are You Real’? ” pic. twitter. com/LXJgBkHYnp
— Oli London ( @OliLondonTV ) April 12, 2024
