Democrat strategist Donna Brazile said Sunday on ABC’s” This Month” that after listening to dental claims, the Supreme Court was near to “election interference” with their account of former President Donald Trump’s resistance state.
Brazile stated,” I’ve never been here before, and I’ve always thought that in the nearly 30 years that I worked in national elections and strategies, I would ever have to figure out some talking points when your player in the case of Donald Trump is sitting in court all time and not on the campaign trail.”
She continued,” I have to make a statement, because I remember Bush v. Gore as if it were yesterday. I do think that the Supreme Court is stifling election meddling by preventing it. Despite not being a lawyer, I had to watch the dental claims the other day. What I heard again was, they were n’t talking about the facts of the case. They were coming up with all these suppositions. They may proceed and allow the district court to start the trial on January 6; we also need to be informed of the results before the election.
She added,” You can still argue the schedule. I mean, the city court of appeal issued this ruling in February. Jack Smith said all along, the special lawyers, said back in December, come back. make the choice, but they do n’t seem to have any.
She concluded,” Justice delayed is republic denied. That’s what’s at play”.
Following Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN
