California Democrat Deborah Robertson has been the president of Rialto, a area south of Los Angeles that boasts only over 100, 000 citizens, since 2012. This November, she is seeking her third four- time name.
And she’s also seeking$ 7.5 million from her town because she believes she is the victim of discrimination.
According to city records, Robertson “filed three separate states final year alleging time and racial bias, invasion of privacy, and improper handling of her pension fund, with a full duty she estimated at$ 7, 482, 000,” according to the Daily Mail. After it reviewed and rejected her claims privately, she has now brought her own management to judge in two claims.
It’s a shift both Rialto citizens and Robertson’s other committee members are calling” personal- serving” and” shocking”.
” It’s surprising, because if you’re not the fiduciarily concerned agent, then who is there for the payer”? asked Democrat Councilman Rafael Trujillo, who is looking to change Robertson as the state’s president. ” She’s but embroiled in all these complaints, she’s lost sight of the course of the area”.
According to Daily Mail.com:
Robertson’s claim is equal to 3.3 % of the entire city budget for the year, or about$ 75 per Rialto resident.
She made the following accusations against the capital:
• Her coworkers made a discriminatory ruling against her by refusing to provide her with ergonomic equipment after an accident involving one car in 2019;
• Because she is dark, the town discriminated against her by refusing to grant her a unique security door in the event of an active shooter, and instead giving one to another counsellor.
• Without providing a compelling reason for a great crime-fighting reason, police looked her up on a law enforcement databases.
•The town owes her compensation because it gave her the incorrect type of retirement plan.
Councilman Ed Scott, a Republican, who has worked closely with Mayor Robertson for decades, is scratching his head over her promises.
He told Daily Mail.com that the president, along with all the state’s officials, were offered ergonomic equipment by the area. Robertson received her safety door, despite the mayor’s plans to relocate her office and the COVID- 19 pandemic having a delay in the installation.
Robertson claimed that the councillor who opened the safety door before her was a” Caucasian.”
The truth is, it was her opposition, Trujillo, who received the entrance first, and he is a Latino.
” I do n’t believe it was a fair analogy on her part that she was being scouted out,” she said. Simply put, I do n’t believe much of nothing was created from it,” Scott said. ” To my knowledge, she’s always been accommodated when she’s had an concern. She has had her office’s equipment changed frequently. So I’m not really certain what that’s all about”.
According to Daily Mail.com, Scott” said he himself had been a sufferer of police snooping” after pro-union officers reportedly searched his and his deceased brother’s details on their collection to find information about his re-election pay. ” He won a$ 500, 000 settlement from the town in November 2021 over it. But he said the president’s near- parallel state with an vision- watering$ 6million desire did n’t create feeling, because she is a pro- union Democrat, with no reason to be smeared”.
” I’m amazed by it”, Scott said. ” I’ve known her for a very long time, so I’m very surprised by it”.
Trujillo believes Robertson is greedy, to the expense of Rialto people.
” There’s a perception that she’s just looking around for the second lawsuit”, he said. Is her day actually being spent leading the city, or is it being used to look for another legal option?
” She’s lost sight of the course of the city”, he stated. ” People see it. She’s been pretty chaotic last year. She is not even present at some of her sessions, according to reports.
You begin to wonder what she intends to do with our money as a tax. Or is it to have individual benefits from the taxpayers?”
We have no compassion for comments containing violence, prejudice, profanity, profanity, doxing, or cruel behavior. If a remark is spam, visit the” icon below and to the right of that comment to reply to it otherwise. Thank you for working with us to keep the conversation moving.